Order Submitted MatterCal. Super. - 6th Dist.May 18, 20201 ‘.L SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F SANTA CLARA . i prAINHFF/RESPONDENT: MICHAEL IVA “3w5W ADDRESS: 527 CHARCOT SAN JOSE,CA‘ NOV 1 7 2020 SWof the Court -County 01 Same ClaraBY DEPUTY .. I DEFENDANT/APPELLANT; MICHAELCLARvmn snvanm F I L E D ADDRESS: 195 EL CAMPo 0“SANJOSE, CA' Wm“ DECISION 0N SUBMITTED MATTER l JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL DE NOVO FROM JUDGMENT OF THE CASE NUMBER: . SMALL CLAIMS COURT 208C083343 ' v COURT REPORTER: NOT REPORTED CLERK: C. PHAM I 7 An Appeal from a JUDGMENT of the SMALL CLAIMS COURTOF SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIMITED ' z , COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, duly came on for healing before HONORABLE Mary E. Arand, Judge of ' - .the Supen'or Court, in Courtroom No. 9 on August 21 , 2020. 1 The Appellant E APPEARED D DID NOTAPPEARD BY/WITH COUNSEL. a'nd Respondent E APPEARED D DID NOT APPEARD BY/WITH COUNSEL. - ’X Evidence having been adduced and the cause argued and submitted to the Court for decision: v It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is rendered, as follows: E Plaintiff/Respondent Michael Ivan Ramirez SHALL RECOVER FROM Defendant/Aggellant Michael Clary (G0 Silver LLC) $ 340.70 PLUS $ 110.00 COSTS FORA TOTAL _ JUDGMENT 0F s 450.70 . A V " D EXHIBITS ARE ORDERED RETURNED TO THE PRESENTING PARTY. E EXHIBITS ARE ORDERED RETURNED TO THE PRESENTING PARTY AND MAILED WITH THE . COPY OF THIS JUDGMENT. E OTHER: The Court accepts Defendant’s analysis of the cost for the cleaning (and finds that Plaintiff is overcharging for AirStreams he did not clean), but finds the expenses charged by Defendant to be excessive.I" :Total amount due: $1700, less $1065 paid, less $294.30 for Defendant’s expenses, for total amount due of $340.70 plus costs. Exhibits remaining in the custody of the clerk of the court 60 days after the date of this order will be destroyed. :gHDated: H /I’7 lww WW3 f d/xA/dMARY E. ARAND JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT and CERTIFICATION OF MAILING t I certify that I am not a party to this action, and that a true copy of this Judgment was served by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as shown on the attached Proof of Service and mailed on the date shown on said ' Proof. Notice is hereby given that judgment in the above entitled matter was entered pursuant to CCP 668.5 on I the date shown below. CLERK OF THE COURT, fiated: H l [7/ 40w Bym Depmy C. PHAM
