Order Submitted MatterCal. Super. - 6th Dist.March 2, 2020" SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F SANTA CLARA ‘ DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: PETER PHAM DEC '0 1 2020 ADDRESS: 1956 JAMES PLACE SAN JOSE, CA 95125 o mung k 0f thfifigflfla cm PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT; FREDERICK ACCOUNTANCY (pAUL sow) DEPUTY ADDRESS; 900 LAFAYETTE ST, STE 201-1 6 . SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 DECISION 0N SUBMITTED MATTER JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL DE Novo FROM JUDGMENT 0F THE CASE NUMBER: SMALL CLAIMS COURT zoscosz781 COURT REPORTER: NOT REPORTED CLERK: c. PHAM An Appeal from a JUDGMENT ofthe SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIMITED COURT, STATE 0F CALIFORNIA, duly came on for hearing before HONORABLE Mary E. Arand, Judge 0f the Superior Court, in Courtroom No. 9 on September 4, 2020. The Appellant E APPEARED D DID NOT APPEAR D BY/WITH COUNSEL. and Respondent E APPEARED D DID NOT APPEAR DBY/W‘ITH COUNSEL. Evidence having been adduced and the cause argued and submitted to the Court for decision: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED thatjudgment is rendered, as follows: E Plaintiff/Resmndent Frederick Accountancy FSB, Inc. SHALL RECOVER FROM Defendant! Angellant PeterPham the sum of $4,182.69 PLUS $125.00 COSTS FOR A TOTAL JUDGMENT OF $4,307.69. D EXHIBITS ARE ORDERED RETURNED TO THE PRESENTING PARTY. E EXHIBITS ARE ORDERED RETURNED TO THE PRESENTING PARTY AND MAILED WITH THE COPY OF THIS JUDGMENT g OTHER: Plaintiff es'tablished the amount of hours billed and the Work done according t0 the terms oflthe contract between the parties. Defendant claimed overbilling and mistakes m thc accounting and preparation of 'the tax returns Defendant did not provide sufficient proof of any breach of contract, negligence 0r overbilling and the Court finds'm favor ofthe Plaintiffin the amount claimed. a Exhibits remaining in the custody 0f the clerk 0fthe court 60 days afier the date ofthis order will be destroyed. Dated: November 30, 2020 . WWW 5 ‘WM . MARY E. ARAND JUDGE 0F THE SUPERIOR COURT 4 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT and CERTIFICATION 0F MAILING l certify that I am not a party to this action, and that a true copy ofthis Judgment was served by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as shown 0n the attached Proofof Service and mailed 0n the date shown 0n said Proof. Notice is hereby given thatjudgment in the above entitled matter was entered pursuant t0 CCP 668.5 0n the date shown below. CLERK OF THE COURT, Dated: la " l “Q40 . By Deputy C. Pham
