29 Cited authorities

  1. Hertz Corp. v. Friend

    559 U.S. 77 (2010)   Cited 4,507 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a corporation's principal place of business is “the place where a corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities”
  2. Mine Workers v. Gibbs

    383 U.S. 715 (1966)   Cited 18,284 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplemental jurisdiction is a "doctrine of discretion"
  3. Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n

    432 U.S. 333 (1977)   Cited 4,591 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading
  4. St. Paul Indemnity Co. v. Cab Co.

    303 U.S. 283 (1938)   Cited 6,234 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff "may resort to the expedient of suing for less than the jurisdictional amount ... though he would be justly entitled to more"
  5. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Ins. Co

    102 F.3d 398 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1,409 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants bears the burden to show that removal is proper
  6. Luckett v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

    171 F.3d 295 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 823 times
    Holding that plaintiff's alleged damages for property damage, travel expenses, an emergency ambulance trip, a stay in the hospital, and pain and suffering met the jurisdictional amount
  7. Galt G/S v. JSS Scandinavia

    142 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 519 times
    Holding that attorney's fees can be counted toward the amount in controversy requirement when a statute allows such fees
  8. White v. FCI USA, Inc.

    319 F.3d 672 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 258 times
    Holding summary judgment was proper when only evidence presented was employee's subjective interpretation of supervisor's remarks rather than being asked or required to commit an unlawful act
  9. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dyer

    19 F.3d 514 (10th Cir. 1994)   Cited 255 times
    Holding that once averment of diversity is challenged, burden is on party invoking jurisdiction to show that it exists
  10. Kantor v. Wellesley Galleries, Ltd.

    704 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 335 times
    Holding state law inapplicable to the question of an individual's citizenship for diversity-jurisdiction purposes
  11. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 116,125 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  12. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 101,122 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  13. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 65,112 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
  14. Section 1441 - Removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1441   Cited 51,851 times   151 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[a]ny civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the ... laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties.”
  15. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 36,298 times   1254 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  16. Section 1446 - Procedure for removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1446   Cited 22,804 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Granting a defendant 30 days to remove after receipt of the first pleading that sets forth a removable claim
  17. Section 3294 - When damages recoverable for sake of example and by way of punishment; employer liability for acts of employee; death from homicide

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3294   Cited 2,876 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Stating plaintiff may recover punitive damages "in addition to the actual damages"
  18. Section 12900 - Short title

    Cal. Gov. Code § 12900   Cited 2,326 times   9 Legal Analyses

    This part may be known and referred to as the "California Fair Employment and Housing Act." Ca. Gov. Code § 12900 Amended by Stats 2022 ch 48 (SB 189),s 29, eff. 6/30/2022(amended Part heading). Added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 992.

  19. Section 12965 - Civil action in name of department on behalf of aggrieved party

    Cal. Gov. Code § 12965   Cited 640 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the courts with discretionary authority to award attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party
  20. Section 2 - Definitions and special rules

    26 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 501 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In section 2, block 1 of the form, he indicated that he did not determine financial policy for Urgent Care, that he did not authorize payments of bills or creditors, and that he did not authorize payroll.