Notice Related CasesCal. Super. - 6th Dist.November 5, 2020ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) Dhaivat H. Shah (SBN 196382); David L Siegel (SBN 264247) Erin M. Adrian (SBN: 228718); Surya Kundu (SBN: 308099) Grellas Shah LLP 20400 Stevens Creek Blvd., Suite 280, Cupertino CA 95014 ~ELE~~ONE NOJ (408)255-6310 FAX NO. (Optional/: (408)2&5-6350 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionalp Plaintiffs Magnoliadrhomes LLC, and Youlin Wang sUPERIoR coURT QF cALIFQRNIA, coUNTY QF Santa Clara sTREETADDREss: 191 North First Street MAILING ADDREss; 191 North First Street clTY ANDzlpcoDE: San Jose, 95 1 13 BRANGH NAME: Superior Court pLAINTIFF/pETITIQNER: Magno 1 iahomesdr LLC and Youl in Wang oEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Guidance Law APC et al. FOR COURT USE ONLY CASE NUMBER: 20CV373145 JUDICIAL OFFICER: CM-015 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE DEPT.: Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, a/I eases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: Magnoliadrhomes LLC v. Peak Financial Company Et Al, b. Case number: CGC-20-582447 c. Court: ~ same asabove other state or federal court (name and address): Sup. Ct of San Francisco County, 400 McAl lister St d. Department: 206 e. Case type: ~ limited civil ~v'nlimited civil ~ probate ~ family law ~ other (specify): f. Filing date: 01/24/2020 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" ~ Yes ~J No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check a/I that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending dismissed ~ with ~ without prejudice disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: Youlin Wang v. Forensic Professional Group USA, lnc. et al b. Case number: 5:20-cv-08033-LHK c. Court: ~ same as above other state or federal court (name and address): U.S. Dist. Ct - N.D. Cal, 280 South First Street d. Department: Chambers of Hon. Judge Lucy H. Koh Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California CM-015 IRev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 tvtvtv court tnfo ca gov E-FILED 3/2/2021 3:49 PM Clerk of Court Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara 20CV373145 Reviewed By: R. Burciaga PLAINTIFF/PETITIDNER: Magnoliahomesdr LLC and Youlin Wang DEFENDANT/REsPDNDENT: Guidance Law APC et al. CASE NUMSER 20CV373 145 CM415 2. (continued) \ e. Case type: ~ limited civil ~ unlimited civil ~ probate ~ family law ~ other (specify)r f. Filing date: 11/13/2020 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex/" ~ Yes ~~ No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check ail that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar daims. arises from the same or substantiaHy identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of Judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case: pending dismissed ~ with ~ without prejudice disposed of by judgment 3 a. Title: b. Case number. c. Court: ~ same as above other state or federal court (name end address): d. Department e. Case type: ~ limited civil ~ unlimited civil ~ probate ~ family law ~ other(specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex7' Yes ~ No h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check ail thatapply).'nvolves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact, involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.~ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h i. Status of case: pending dismissed ~ with ~ without prejudice disposed of by judgment 4, ~ Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: Date: March 2, 2021 Su a Kundu, Es . (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) CM-O'IS IReu. July 'I. 200yt NOTICE OF RELATED CASE ISIG RE OF PARTY O NEY) Pa0O 2 OI0 pLAINTIFF/pETITIDNER: Magno1iahomesdr LLC and Youl in Wang DEFENDANT/REsPQNDENT: Guidance Law APC et al. CASE NUMBER: 20CV373 145 CM-015 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Related Case if you are a partyin the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service. The notice must be served on all known parties in each related action or proceeding.) 1. I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): 20400 Stevens Creek Blvd. Ste. 280 Cupertino, CA 95014 I served a copy of the Notice of Related Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with first-class postage fully prepaid and (check one): a. M deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. b. ~ placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. 3. The Notice of Related Case was mailed: on (date) 03-02-2021 b. from (city and state): CuPertino, CA 4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person served: Richard M. Kahn, Agent for Forensic Professional Group USA, Inc. Street address: 2921 Augusta Circle City: Homestead State and zip code: c. Name of person served Richard M. Kahn, Individual Street addres . 2921 Augusta Circle City: Homestead State and zip code: FL, 33035 b. Name of person served: Amanda E. Manahan, Esq d. Name of person served: for Guidance Law APC Street address: 20 Enterprise Ste. 375 City: Aliso Viejo State and zip code: CA, 92656 Street address: City: State and zip code Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 03-02-2021 Christina M. Munoz (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIG ATURE OF DECLARANT) CM-01 5 [Rev. July 1, 2007( NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Page 3 of 3