§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of City of New York, et al., Appellants,v.New York State Nurses Association, et al., Respondents.

Brief

24 Cited authorities

  1. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,551 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 425 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  3. Matter of Howard v. Wyman

    28 N.Y.2d 434 (N.Y. 1971)   Cited 822 times
    Holding that the "interpretation given a statute by the administering agency 'if not irrational or unreasonable, should be upheld'"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 261 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. Matter of Arrocha v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y

    93 N.Y.2d 361 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 170 times
    Upholding denial of teaching license based on prior felony drug conviction notwithstanding applicant's possession of certificate of relief from disabilities

  6. Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    48 N.Y.2d 398 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 111 times
    Evaluating PERB determination

  7. Chenango Forks Cent. Sch. Dist. v. State Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4039 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 27 times

    No. 104 06-06-2013 In the Matter of Chenango Forks Central School District, Appellant, v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board et al., Respondents. Lars P. Mead, for appellant. David P. Quinn, for respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board. Frederick K. Reich, for respondent Chenango Forks Teachers Association. READ Lars P. Mead, for appellant. David P. Quinn, for respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board. Frederick K. Reich, for respondent Chenango

  8. District Council 37 v. City of New York

    22 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 35 times
    Noting that the court “typically” defers to the expertise of the Board in its interpretation of the NYCCBL

  9. Jonas v. Stackler

    95 A.D.3d 1325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 16 times

    2012-05-30 In the Matter of Robert P. JONAS, Jr., respondent, v. Walter STACKLER, etc., et al., appellants. Humes & Wagner, LLP, Locust Valley, N.Y. (John Ritter, Jr., and Christopher G. Wagner of counsel), for appellants. Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo, Cohn & Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Judy Lynn Simoncic of counsel), for respondent. REINALDO E. RIVERA Humes & Wagner, LLP, Locust Valley, N.Y. (John Ritter, Jr., and Christopher G. Wagner of counsel), for appellants. Forchelli, Curto

  10. Antinore v. State of New York

    49 A.D.2d 6 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)   Cited 71 times
    Finding collective bargaining agreements made by "a reciprocal negotiation between forces with strengths on both sides, reflecting the reconciled interests of employer and employees, voluntarily entered into" can waive due process rights

  11. Section 25.29 - Removal or disciplinary action

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 25.29   Cited 5 times

    (a) An employee described in paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of this subdivision shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty provided in this section except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges pursuant to this section, unless such employee is granted the option and elects to follow the alternative disciplinary procedure set forth in subdivision (h) of this section: (1) an employee holding a position by permanent appointment in the competitive

  12. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation