2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2413 (N.Y. 2012) Cited 387 times
Declining to reform marital settlement agreement under theory of mutual mistake or order restitution for unjust enrichment where complaining spouse received BLMIS account, now worth significantly less than believed at the time of the agreement
257 A.D.2d 76 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999) Cited 565 times
Holding that although a summary judgment motion presumes the facts to be true and accorded every favorable inference, allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions, as well as factual claims either inherently incredible or flatly contradicted by documentary evidence, are not entitled to such consideration
Holding that nothing in the plaintiff's conduct could be construed as “being undertaken in good faith, for a purpose ‘reasonably believed’ to be in the best interests of [the defendant]” where the plaintiff intentionally denied a sublease application on the basis of race and “knowingly exposed” the defendant to liability under the civil rights laws
Finding that additional grounds for dismissal raised in a reply affidavit did not violate the single-motion rule where the arguments could not have been raised earlier due to the "indefiniteness" of plaintiff's initial complaint