§Why CasetextPricing

Affidavit Peremptory Challenge CCP 170 6

undefined

4 Cited authorities

  1. Fight for the Rams v. Superior Court

    41 Cal.App.4th 953 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 10 times
    In Fight for the Rams v. Superior Court (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 953, we determined plaintiff's predecessor timely sought to recuse a superior court judge and granted relief. There, the author of this opinion wrote the following: "Despite the trial judge's probably accurate observation that this lawsuit has little prospect of success, he was not called upon to, nor did he, make `a determination of contested fact issues relating to the merits.'"

  2. Bambula v. Superior Court

    174 Cal.App.3d 653 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 14 times
    Referring to motions for summary judgment

  3. Section 170.6 - Judge or court commissioner prejudiced against party or attorney or interest of party or attorney

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 170.6   Cited 1,286 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In section 170.6, enacted in 1957, the Legislature sought successfully to overcome the constitutional objections to section 170.5 (Johnson v. Superior Court, supra, 50 Cal.2d 693.)

  4. Rule 3.516 - Motions under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6

    Cal. R. 3.516   Cited 2 times

    A party making a peremptory challenge by motion or affidavit of prejudice regarding an assigned judge must submit it in writing to the assigned judge within 20 days after service of the order assigning the judge to the coordination proceeding. All plaintiff's or similar parties in the included or coordinated actions constitute a side and all defendants or similar parties in such actions constitute a side for purposes of applying Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. Cal. R. Ct. 3.516 Rule 3.516