§Why CasetextPricing

Minute Order

undefined

7 Cited authorities

  1. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.

    24 Cal.App.4th 1426 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 266 times
    Holding that service of process fails when sent generally to a business's address

  2. Rodriguez v. Cho

    236 Cal.App.4th 742 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding there was no extrinsic fraud in service of complaint, but default judgment was void under § 473, subd. (d), because the damages exceeded the amount demanded in the complaint

  3. Summers v. Mcclanahan

    140 Cal.App.4th 403 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 74 times
    Holding that a personal manager was not a close enough relationship to ensure actual notice of service due to lack of evidence that they were in constant communication

  4. Lebel v. Mai

    210 Cal.App.4th 1154 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 20 times
    Noting plaintiff tenant failed to exercise reasonable diligence in ascertaining a foreign landlord's address for purposes of the Hague Convention when plaintiff knew landlord lived in London, England and when defendant had provided plaintiff both his email address and telephone number where he could be reached in connection with the tenancy

  5. Bolkiah v. Superior Ct. of L.A. Cty.

    74 Cal.App.4th 984 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 26 times
    Noting that Section 417.20 does not require proof of actual delivery via a signed return receipt but does require proof via "evidence" which is "satisfactory to the court."

  6. Rancho Santa Fe Pharmacy, Inc. v. Seyfert

    219 Cal.App.3d 875 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 37 times
    In Rancho Sante Fe Pharmacy, Inc. v. Seyfert (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 875, 883-884, the court concluded that the evidentiary burden at issue in Civil Code sections 1614 and 1615, is the burden of producing evidence, rather than the burden of proof.

  7. Evangelize China Fellowship v. Evangelize China

    146 Cal.App.3d 440 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 14 times

    Docket No. 66148. August 24, 1983. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. C 368086, George Kalinski, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL Tuttle Taylor, Merrick J. Bobb and Henry T. Greely for Plaintiff and Appellant. Jerry M. Hill, Gary L. Bostwick and Barash Hill for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION HANSON (Thaxton), J. Plaintiff Evangelize China Fellowship, Inc. (hereinafter ECF, Inc.) appeals from the trial court's minute order quashing