§Why CasetextPricing

Patrick Bernard Roberts and Chandelle Catherine Roberts

Motion for Relief from Stay, 34907 38th Avenue Ct E, Eatonville, WA 98328. Proof of Service.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In re Veal)

    450 B.R. 897 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 408 times
    Holding that appellate review may proceed based on the record as a whole even without formal findings

  2. In re Ellis

    60 B.R. 432 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that relief from stay after confirmation of a chapter 13 plan is not barred by section 1327 when the relief is based on defaults in post-confirmation payments

  3. Section 362 - Automatic stay

    11 U.S.C. § 362   Cited 29,383 times   174 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that cause exists to lift the stay because no bankruptcy purpose would be served by keeping the stay in place

  4. Section 62A.3-301 - Person entitled to enforce instrument

    Wash. Rev. Code § 62A.3-301   Cited 88 times

    "Person entitled to enforce" an instrument means (i) the holder of the instrument, (ii) a nonholder in possession of the instrument who has the rights of a holder, or (iii) a person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to RCW 62A.3-309 or 62A.3-418(d). A person may be a person entitled to enforce the instrument even though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument. RCW 62A.3-301 1993 c 229 § 29; 1965