19 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Texas Extrusion Corp.

    844 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir. 1988)   Cited 178 times
    Holding final order is appealable even if interlocutory appeal is not obtained
  2. Barron & Newburger, P.C. v. Tex. Skyline, Ltd. (In re Woerner)

    783 F.3d 266 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 56 times
    Holding that a court is permitted to "compensate an attorney not only for activities that were 'necessary,' but also for good gambles . . . even when those gambles do not produce an 'identifiable, tangible, and material benefit'"
  3. In Matter of Cajun Electric Power Cooperative

    150 F.3d 503 (5th Cir. 1998)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that § 1129 is designed to assure that payments for professional services connected with the debtor's Chapter 11 case will be subject to the bankruptcy court's approval and determination of reasonableness
  4. In re River Village Associates

    181 B.R. 795 (E.D. Pa. 1995)   Cited 40 times
    Upholding confirmation of plan that permitted a secured creditor to credit bid and noting that "Congress did not intend to deprive creditors of the right to bid their full claim under a reorganization plan," without addressing whether such the right to credit bid was guaranteed under section 1129(b)
  5. In re Phoenix Petroleum Co.

    278 B.R. 385 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2001)   Cited 20 times
    Noting that, in the Chapter 7 context, property a trustee fails to administer is abandoned back to the debtor when the case is closed, but only with respect to property of the estate which has been "scheduled" by the debtor
  6. In re Lisanti Foods, Inc.

    329 B.R. 491 (D.N.J. 2005)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that while § 1129 requires approval of fees for pre-confirmation services, a plan may allow for payment of post-confirmation fees in the ordinary course of business without bankruptcy court approval
  7. In re Divine Ripe, L.L.C.

    554 B.R. 395 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2016)   Cited 4 times

    CASE NO: 15–70405 07-21-2016 In re: Divine Ripe, L.L.C., Debtor Antonio Martinez, Jr, Attorney at Law, McAllen, TX, for Debtor. Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge Antonio Martinez, Jr, Attorney at Law, McAllen, TX, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSTAINING FRESCOS TOMVER, S.A. DE C.V.'S OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND DENYING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO APPOINT SAUL ZUNIGA AS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF DIVINE RIPE, L.L.C. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 9001(5)(A) [Resolving

  8. In re Metrocraft Pub. Services, Inc.

    39 B.R. 567 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1984)   Cited 39 times
    Denying chapter 11 debtor's application for approval of disclosure statement where it failed to include information concerning any potential claims that might exist between debtor and affiliate
  9. Paradigm Air Carriers, Inc. v. Partners (In re Partners)

    521 B.R. 134 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2014)   Cited 4 times

    Bankruptcy No. 10–43400–DML–11. Adversary No. 11–04017–SGJ. 10-10-2014 In re TEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL PARTNERS, Debtor. Paradigm Air Carriers, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs/Counter–Defendants, v. Texas Rangers Baseball Partners, Defendant/Counter–Plaintiff. Phil C. Appenzeller, Jr., Munsch, Hardt, Kopf & Harr, P.C., Jeffrey R. Fine, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Darren P. Nicholson, Richard A. Sayles, Robert L. Sayles, Sayles Werbner, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs/Counter–Defendants. Isaac Joseph Brown, Munsch Hardt

  10. In re Keisler

    Case No. 08-34321 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2009)   Cited 2 times

    Case No. 08-34321. June 29, 2009 JENKINS JENKINS ATTORNEYS, PLLC, Michael H. Fitzpatrick, Esq., Knoxville, Tennessee, Attorneys for Debtors. JAMES KELLY GIFFEN, ESQ., Knoxville, Tennessee, Attorneys for Mission Compound, LLC, Courmont Wapner Associates, LLC, Dr. R. Glenn Hall, Fundacion Galvez, James Hall, John Bracken, Jordan E. Glazov and Sheila N. Glazov, and Kenneth and Ellen Nibali Trust. RICHARD F. CLIPPARD, ESQ., UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Patricia C. Foster, Esq., Knoxville, Tennessee, Attorneys

  11. Section 157 - Procedures

    28 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 43,740 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Determining the validity, extent, or priority of liens
  12. Section 1334 - Bankruptcy cases and proceedings

    28 U.S.C. § 1334   Cited 33,122 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting "exclusive jurisdiction" to a federal court handling a bankruptcy case "of all the property, wherever located, of the debtor as of the commencement of such case, and of property of the estate"
  13. Section 1408 - Venue of cases under title 11

    28 U.S.C. § 1408   Cited 3,249 times   12 Legal Analyses
    In 28 U.S.C. § 1408(1), venue of bankruptcy cases is limited to, inter alia, districts in which the debtor's principal place of business has been located for 180 days before the petition was filed.
  14. Section 1125 - Postpetition disclosure and solicitation

    11 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 844 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Requiring court approval of the disclosure statement prior to plan confirmation
  15. Section 1126 - Acceptance of plan

    11 U.S.C. § 1126   Cited 692 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that impaired claim and interest holders are entitled to vote on plan approval
  16. Rule 3020 - Deposit; Confirmation of Plan in a Chapter 9 Municipality or Chapter 11 Reorganization Case

    Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3020   Cited 182 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the confirmation hearing shall be after notice and hearing as provided by Rule 2002
  17. Rule 3017 - Court Consideration of Disclosure Statement in a Chapter 9 Municipality or Chapter 11 Reorganization Case

    Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3017   Cited 92 times
    Stating that those entitled to receive ballots and notice of the voting deadline are "creditors and equity security holders . . . on the date the order approving the disclosure statement is entered or another date fixed by the court . . . ."
  18. Rule 3016 - Filing of Plan and Disclosure Statement in a Chapter 9 Municipality or Chapter 11 Reorganization Case

    Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3016   Cited 77 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Addressing injunctions under a plan and stating "[i]f a plan provides for an injunction against conduct not otherwise enjoined under the Code, the plan and disclosure statement shall describe in specific and conspicuous language (bold, italic, or underlined text) all acts to be enjoined and identify the entities that would be subject to the injunction."