29 Cited authorities

  1. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,623 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  2. Blank v. Kirwan

    39 Cal.3d 311 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 2,969 times
    Holding that the standard for a failure to state a claim is whether "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"
  3. Hughes v. Pair

    46 Cal.4th 1035 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 928 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discomfort, worry, anxiety, upset stomach, concern, and agitation did not establish severe emotional distress
  4. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.

    2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,169 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.
  5. Action v. City of Santa Monica

    41 Cal.4th 1232 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 441 times
    Recognizing exceptions to the litigation privilege when the statute is more specific than the litigation privilege and would be significantly or wholly inoperable if its enforcement were barred when in conflict with the privilege
  6. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions

    38 Cal.4th 264 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 455 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "California courts have adopted the same standard as [Title VII] for hostile work environment sexual harassment claims."
  7. Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc.

    178 Cal.App.4th 243 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 390 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all materials submitted by plaintiff to DFEH, including two intake questionnaires, may be considered for purposes of determining whether plaintiff had exhausted his administrative remedies
  8. Kashian v. Harriman

    98 Cal.App.4th 892 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 434 times
    Holding that even the "fil[ing] [of] meritless lawsuits on behalf of 'sham plaintiffs'" was "essentially communicative conduct" to which the litigation privilege applied, "even though it also may have involved noncommunicative acts"
  9. Neville v. Chudacoff

    160 Cal.App.4th 1255 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 261 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to be privileged under section 47, a statement must be "reasonably relevant" to pending or contemplated litigation
  10. Mintz v. Blue Cross of California

    172 Cal.App.4th 1594 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 128 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "corporate agents and employees acting for and on behalf of a corporation cannot be held liable for inducing a breach of the corporation's contract"