§Why CasetextPricing

Robert Obey, Appellant,v.City of New York, Defendant, New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. Soto v. New York City Transit Authority

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2231 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 95 times
    Describing the jury verdict allocating fault on which the judgment being affirmed was based

  2. Firmes v. Manhattan

    50 A.D.3d 18 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 65 times
    Rejecting argument that plaintiff's conduct operating his motorcycle without a valid license, registration or insurance is sufficiently serious to completely bar recovery on public policy grounds

  3. KBL, LLP v. Cmty. Counseling & Mediation Servs.

    123 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses

    13730, 600597/08 12-09-2014 KBL, LLP, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. COMMUNITY COUNSELING & MEDIATION SERVICES, Defendant–Appellant. Loanzon LLP, New York (Tristan C. Loanzon of counsel), for appellant. Alan E. Kahn, New York, for respondent. Loanzon LLP, New York (Tristan C. Loanzon of counsel), for appellant. Alan E. Kahn, New York, for respondent. MAZZARELLI, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, SAXE, KAPNICK, JJ. Opinion Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered October 22, 2013, which

  4. Dibble v. N.Y. City

    76 A.D.3d 272 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 14 times
    In Dibble the train operator applied the emergency brakes when he first noticed a human form on the tracks (76 A.D.3d at 274, 903 N.Y.S.2d 376).

  5. Grinberg v. C&L Contracting Corp.

    107 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 4 times

    2013-06-13 Mark GRINBERG, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. C & L CONTRACTING CORPORATION, Defendant–Respondent. The Perecman Firm, PLLC, New York (Peter D. Rigelhaupt of counsel), for appellant. Newman Myers Kreines Gross Harris, P.C., New York (Stephen N. Shapiro of counsel), for respondent. ACOSTA The Perecman Firm, PLLC, New York (Peter D. Rigelhaupt of counsel), for appellant. Newman Myers Kreines Gross Harris, P.C., New York (Stephen N. Shapiro of counsel), for respondent. ACOSTA, J.P., SAXE, MOSKOWITZ

  6. Ramos v. New York City Transit Auth.

    90 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 5 times

    2011-12-13 Luis RAMOS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant–Appellant. Gruvman, Giordano & Glaws, LLP, New York (Charles T. Glaws of counsel), for appellant. Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for respondent. MAZZARELLI Gruvman, Giordano & Glaws, LLP, New York (Charles T. Glaws of counsel), for appellant. Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for respondent. MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, RENWICK, FREEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ. Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green

  7. Alicea v. City of N.Y

    85 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 5 times

    No. 5392. June 21, 2011. Amended judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered March 23, 2010, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff $158,960 for past pain and suffering and $782,800 for future pain and suffering over a period of 38 years, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from the date of the verdict, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate the award of interest and remand the matter

  8. Rivera v. New York City Transit Auth.

    92 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 4 times

    2012-02-14 Lizzette RIVERA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant–Appellant,Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, et al., Defendants. Jeffrey Samel & Partners, New York (David Samel of counsel), for appellant. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent. TOM Jeffrey Samel & Partners, New York (David Samel of counsel), for appellant. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel)

  9. Section 600.10 - Format and content of records, appendices and briefs

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.10   Cited 11 times

    (a) Form and size. (1) Generally; paper and page size. Records, appendices and briefs shall be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black on white copy and shall be on a good grade of white, opaque, unglazed recycled paper that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (e) of this section. Paper shall measure vertically 11 inches on the bound edge and horizontally 81/2 inches. The clerk may refuse to accept for filing a paper which is not legible or otherwise does not comply