16 Cited authorities

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 4,763 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”
  2. Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp.

    14 Cal.4th 394 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 748 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding fraud in the inducement "occurs when the promisor knows what he is signing but his consent is induced by fraud"
  3. Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.

    45 Cal.4th 634 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 250 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a demand letter under section 1782 can set forth "an individual or class grievance" with respect to alleged violations of section 1770
  4. Union Bank v. Superior Court

    31 Cal.App.4th 573 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 352 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding no right to a cause of action because plaintiff admitted the defendant did not engage in misconduct
  5. Mass. Mutual Life Ins. v. Superior Ct.

    97 Cal.App.4th 1282 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 221 times
    Holding that under the CLRA, "if the trial court finds material misrepresentations were made to the class members, at least an inference of reliance would arise as to the entire class."
  6. Marin Storage Trucking v. Benco Contracting

    89 Cal.App.4th 1042 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 171 times
    Holding that "ordinarily one who signs an instrument which on its face is a contract is deemed to assent to all its terms," and that " party cannot avoid the terms of a contract on the ground that he or she failed to read it before signing."
  7. Bower v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

    196 Cal.App.4th 1545 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 102 times
    In Bower, the plaintiff characterized her injury as being "denied any opportunity [to] shop around for retailers that do not charge consumers this discretionary fee."
  8. Mission Viejo Emergency Med. Assoc. v. Beta Healthcare Grp.

    197 Cal.App.4th 1146 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 80 times
    Noting that under the holding in Concepcion the "[g]eneral state law doctrine pertaining to unconscionability is preserved unless it involves a defense that applies 'only to arbitration or that derive[its] meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue'"
  9. Masterson v. Sine

    68 Cal.2d 222 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 221 times
    Holding instrument is integrated if it contains a clause stating "that there are no previous understandings or agreements not contained in the writing"
  10. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Superior Court

    52 Cal.App.3d 30 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the purpose of § 1782 is to "provide and facilitate pre-complaint settlements of consumer actions wherever possible" and that this can "only be accomplished by a literal application of the notice provisions"