§Why CasetextPricing

Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade, et al., Respondents, The Livery Roundtable, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Respondents,v.Michael R. Bloomberg,, et al., Appellants, Livery Base Owners Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

Brief

10 Cited authorities

  1. Dorset v. Cultural Resources

    46 N.Y.2d 358 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 123 times
    In Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural Resources, 46 N.Y.2d 358, 385 N.E.2d 1284, 413 N.Y.S.2d 357 (1978), for example, the New York Court of Appeals found that a state statute apparently specifically tailored to provide benefits for the Museum of Modern Art was a general law because it applied to a class, "entry into which was governed by conformity to or compliance with specified conditions."

  2. New York City v. Patrolmen's Assn

    89 N.Y.2d 380 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 28 times
    Rejecting alternative application to uphold only part of subject law

  3. Adler v. Deegan

    251 N.Y. 467 (N.Y. 1929)   Cited 179 times
    Upholding the Multiple Dwelling Law against a claim that it violated the city home rule provisions of the Constitution

  4. Baldwin v. City of Buffalo

    6 N.Y.2d 168 (N.Y. 1959)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that alteration of ward boundaries is a matter within the affairs of the city

  5. Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural Resources

    63 A.D.2d 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

    July 13, 1978 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, NATHANIEL T. HELMAN, J. Arthur Richenthal of counsel (Richenthal, Abrams Moss, attorneys), for appellant. Alfred Weinstein of counsel (L. Kevin Sheridan with him on the brief; Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel), for Mayor of the City of New York, respondent. Manly Fleischmann of counsel (Webster Sheffield, attorneys), for Trust for Cultural Resources, respondent. Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel (Samuel A. Hirshowitz with her on

  6. City of New York v. Village of Lawrence

    250 N.Y. 429 (N.Y. 1929)   Cited 48 times
    In City of New York v. Village of Lawrence (250 N.Y. 429, 435) we receive the juridical interpretation of the scope and effect of these sections.

  7. Matter of Rudack v. Valentine

    163 Misc. 326 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1937)   Cited 16 times
    In Rudack v. Valentine (Spec.Term, N Y County, 1937), 163 Misc. 326, 295 N.Y.S. 976, aff'd, 1937, 274 N.Y. 615, 10 N.E.2d 577, the court held that the licensing and regulation of the taxicab industry is a valid exercise of a municipality's police power.

  8. Matter of Rudack v. Valentine

    10 N.E.2d 577 (N.Y. 1937)   Cited 14 times

    Submitted May 26, 1937 Decided June 11, 1937 Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York County. Joseph G. Fenster for appellant. Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Francis J. Bloustein and Paxton Blair of counsel), for Lewis J. Valentine et al., respondents. Harold Riegelman, H.H. Nordlinger and Jacob M. Dinnes for League of Mutual Taxi Owners, Inc., et al., interveners, respondents. Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY

  9. Yellow Taxicab Co. v. Gaynor

    82 Misc. 94 (N.Y. Misc. 1913)   Cited 26 times

    August, 1913. Leary Goodbody (Edgar T. Brackett, Edward W. Hatch, Samuel F. Moran, Arthur K. Wing, Henry Bennet Leary, William I. Goodbody, of counsel), for plaintiff Yellow Taxicab Company. Dixon Holmes, for plaintiff Hotel Astor. Wing Wing, for plaintiff Universal Taximeter Cab Company. Baldwin Hutchins, for plaintiff Hilliard Hotel Company. Harvey T. Andrews, for plaintiffs Motor Taximeter Cab Company and the Forty-seventh Street Taxicab Company. Campbell Boland, for plaintiff Hotel Woodward Company

  10. Section 181 - Ordinances to regulate taxicabs and limousines

    N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 181   Cited 11 times

    The municipal officers and boards in the several cities, towns and villages of this state now having the authority to enact ordinances, may adopt ordinances regulating: 1. The registration and licensing of taxicabs and may limit the number of taxicabs to be licensed and the county of Westchester may adopt ordinances regulating the registration and licensing of taxicabs and limousines and may limit the number to be licensed; the county of Nassau may adopt ordinances regulating the registration of