53 Cited authorities

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 4,763 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,199 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding summary judgment appropriate for defendant on age discrimination claim where plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue that defendant's proffered reasons were pretext
  3. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

    35 Cal.4th 797 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 1,219 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[r]esolution of the statute of limitations issue is normally a question of fact."
  4. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.

    7 Cal.4th 503 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 1,159 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no separate cause of action for civil conspiracy, and that to establish such an action, a plaintiff must show some other underlying tort or civil wrong
  5. Teselle v. McLoughlin

    173 Cal.App.4th 156 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 334 times
    Stating that a right to an accounting can exist solely from possession by the defendant of money which, because of the parties' relationship, the defendant is obliged to surrender
  6. City v. Merrill Lynch

    68 Cal.App.4th 445 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 443 times
    Holding allegation that brokerage firm encouraged client to undertake "imprudent and unsuitable" investment program that included "speculative investments in extremely volatile securities, risky transactions in highly leveraged interest-bearing instruments, and excessive commissions" sufficient to state a claim for breach of fiduciary duty
  7. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.

    171 Cal.App.4th 1305 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 323 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that payment of extra money as a result of the defendant's action was sufficient for standing
  8. Huong Que, Inc. v. Luu

    150 Cal.App.4th 400 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 309 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all employees owe a duty of loyalty to their employer
  9. Reeves v. Hanlon

    33 Cal.4th 1140 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 285 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a plaintiff may recover damages for intentional interference with an at-will employment relation under the same California standard applicable to claims for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage"
  10. Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack

    223 Cal.App.4th 1105 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming dismissal of UCL cause of action against attorney where attorney's violation of Rule 3-310 was alleged as a fraudulent, unfair, and unlawful act, but plaintiff failed to allege causation of damage from that violation