§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Roxanne Adrian, Appellant,v.Board of Education of City School District of City of Niagara Falls et al., Respondents.

Brief

47 Cited authorities

  1. Board of Regents v. Roth

    408 U.S. 564 (1972)   Cited 14,653 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."

  2. Perry v. Sindermann

    408 U.S. 593 (1972)   Cited 4,496 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mutually explicit understanding could give rise to protected property interest

  3. Boddie v. Connecticut

    401 U.S. 371 (1971)   Cited 2,506 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process required access to the courts for filing divorce proceedings, regardless of the ability to pay

  4. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,551 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal

  5. Connally v. General Const. Co.

    269 U.S. 385 (1926)   Cited 2,758 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute violates due process for vagueness if “men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application”

  6. Hellenic Am. Neighborhood v. City of New York

    101 F.3d 877 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 541 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "there is no constitutional violation (and no available § 1983 action) when there is an adequate state postdeprivation procedure to remedy a random, arbitrary deprivation of property or liberty"

  7. Brad H. v. City of New York et al

    17 N.Y.3d 180 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 187 times
    Noting that where a contract's language is "written so imperfectly that it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation," it is deemed to be ambiguous.

  8. Matter of Field Delivery Serv

    66 N.Y.2d 516 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 378 times
    Stating that agency decision "which neither adheres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious"

  9. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 407 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  10. Evans v. Famous Music Corp.

    1 N.Y.3d 452 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 178 times
    Holding that contract provision stating that plaintiff songwriters were entitled to a percentage of "all net sums actually received" by defendant music publishing company, after deduction of certain taxes and expenses, did not obligate defendant "to make payments to the songwriters in the event that foreign tax credit proved beneficial" to defendant

  11. Section 3020-A - Disciplinary procedures and penalties

    N.Y. Educ. Law § 3020-A   Cited 919 times
    Applying to "person enjoying the benefits of tenure"