§Why CasetextPricing

Weyandt v. Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Associations and its affiliates

MEMORANDUM

13 Cited authorities

  1. Los Angeles v. Lyons

    461 U.S. 95 (1983)   Cited 7,492 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold

  2. United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty

    445 U.S. 388 (1980)   Cited 2,010 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding even a named plaintiff whose individual claims are moot retains a "personal stake" in representing the class jurisdictionally sufficient to appeal the denial of class certification

  3. Janus v. Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Emps., Council 31

    138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018)   Cited 509 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring public-sector union dues from nonmembers violates the First Amendment, and overruling Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed. , 431 U.S. 209, 97 S.Ct. 1782, 52 L.Ed.2d 261, based on "both factual and legal" developments that had "eroded the decision's underpinnings and left it an outlier among our First Amendment cases"

  4. Gould Elecs. Inc. v. U.S.

    220 F.3d 169 (3d Cir. 2000)   Cited 2,625 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "law of the place" in the sixth prong of § 1346(b) is jurisdictional

  5. Buck v. Hampton Tp. Sch. Dist

    452 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,548 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in analyzing a motion to dismiss, the court may consider documents “attached to or submitted with the complaint, and any matters incorporated by reference or integral to the claim, items subject to judicial notice, matters of public record, orders, items appearing in the record of the case.”

  6. Constitution Party of Pa. v. Aichele

    757 F.3d 347 (3d Cir. 2014)   Cited 993 times
    Holding that it is error to construe a motion to dismiss as a "factual attack" where the defendant has not "presented competing facts"

  7. Mortensen v. First Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n

    549 F.2d 884 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 3,761 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that dismissal under Rule 12(b) would be “unusual” when the facts necessary to succeed on the merits are at least in part the same as must be alleged or proven to withstand jurisdictional attacks

  8. Burke v. Barnes

    479 U.S. 361 (1987)   Cited 241 times
    Holding that a claim was moot when the legislative bill that it challenged expired by its own terms after the court of appeals entered judgment

  9. N.J. Turnpike Auth. v. Jersey Cent. Power

    772 F.2d 25 (3d Cir. 1985)   Cited 133 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding action moot where the court could only speculate that there is a reasonable expectation of repetition

  10. Marcavage v. Nat'l Park Serv.

    666 F.3d 856 (3d Cir. 2012)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that a protester's claim was moot because the citation he was issued for protesting without a permit was not reasonably likely to recur because of subsequent changes to regulations

  11. Section 1101.301 - Definitions

    43 Pa. Stat. § 1101.301   Cited 56 times
    Defining an "[e]mploye organization" as, in essence, a union