§Why CasetextPricing

Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.

MEMORANDUM

8 Cited authorities

  1. Hilton Davis Chemical v. Warner-Jenkinson

    62 F.3d 1512 (Fed. Cir. 1995)   Cited 193 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents requires proof of insubstantial differences between the claimed and accused products"

  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. the Coca-Cola Co.

    107 F.R.D. 288 (D. Del. 1985)   Cited 95 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the formulae for Coke, New Coke, and Diet Coke, while all trade secrets, should be disclosed to the plaintiff because they had met their burden of demonstrating a need for the formula greater than the company's need for protection of its secrets

  3. Baron Services, Inc. v. Media Weather Innovations LLC

    717 F.3d 907 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that the district court abused its discretion by not deferring summary judgment where nonmoving party adequately explained how additional discovery was relevant

  4. Optimize Tech. Sols., LLC. v. Staples, Inc.

    Case No. 14-mc-80095-LHK (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2014)   Cited 13 times

    Case No. 14-mc-80095-LHK (HRL) 04-14-2014 OPTIMIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC. Plaintiff, v. STAPLES, INC., ET AL., Defendants. Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge ORDER RE: MOTION TO QUASH; MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; MOTION TO COMPEL; MOTIONS TO SEAL [Re Docket Nos. 1, 6, 12, 13, 15] Third party Adobe Systems, Inc. (Adobe) filed a Motion to Quash and Motion for a Protective Order in response to plaintiff Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC's (Optimize) document and deposition subpoenas

  5. Metavante Corporation v. Emigrant Savings Bank

    Case No. 05-CV-1221 (E.D. Wis. May. 5, 2008)   Cited 2 times
    Acknowledging that a party's source code contained "confidential business information"

  6. Dynamic Microprocessor Associates v. EKD Computer Sales

    919 F. Supp. 101 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting motion to compel source code because it was needed to defend against plaintiff's claims

  7. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,538 times   650 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  8. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,731 times   319 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness