Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 26,197 times 224 Legal AnalysesHolding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
526 U.S. 137 (1999) Cited 12,574 times 28 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
United States v. Downing
753 F.2d 1224 (3d Cir. 1985) Cited 689 timesHolding that “a defendant who seeks the admission of expert testimony must make an on-the-record detailed proffer to the court, including an explanation of precisely how the expert's testimony is relevant to the [issues in dispute]”
Anders v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc.
409 F. App'x 539 (3d Cir. 2011) Cited 3 timesNo. 09-3880. Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on December 14, 2010. Opinion Filed: February 2, 2011. On Appeal from the District Court of the Virgin Islands (D.C. Civ. No. 04-cv-00036), District Judge: Hon. Lawrence F. Stengel. Maria Anders, Marietta, GA, pro se. Rich Anders, Marietta, GA, pro se. Before: FUENTES, SMITH, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: This matter arises from injuries incurred as a result of a May 23, 2003 car accident involving
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 26,547 times 251 Legal AnalysesAdopting the Daubert standard