30 Cited authorities

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 265,662 times 364 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Bay Area Laundry v. Ferbar
522 U.S. 192 (1997) Cited 623 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a new statute of limitations starts to run with each missed payment or when payment of the debt is accelerated
Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co.
116 Cal.App.4th 1375 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Cited 236 times
Holding that monthly payments were divisible from each other and that a new cause of action for breach accrued periodically
Hassler v. Account Brokers of Larimer Cnty., Inc.
274 P.3d 547 (Colo. 2012) Cited 37 times
Holding that acceleration requires a clear, unequivocal act evincing an intent to invoke the creditor's contractual option to accelerate
Interbank Inv. v. Vail Val. W
12 P.3d 1224 (Colo. App. 2000) Cited 52 times
Finding that a material breach "goes to the root of the matter or essence of the contract"
Xenophon Strategies, Inc. v. Jernigan Copeland & Anderson, PLLC
268 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.D.C. 2017) Cited 18 times
Civil Action No. 15–1774 (RBW) 08-01-2017 XENOPHON STRATEGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. JERNIGAN COPELAND & ANDERSON, PLLC, Defendant. Douglas Chatham Herbert, Jr., Law Office of Douglas C. Herbert, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Samuel Becket Russell, Russell Firm, Washington, DC, for Defendant. REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Douglas Chatham Herbert, Jr., Law Office of Douglas C. Herbert, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Samuel Becket Russell, Russell Firm, Washington, DC, for Defendant
America Production v. Patterson
185 P.3d 811 (Colo. 2008) Cited 28 times
Holding that rule favoring longer, rather than shorter, of two arguably applicable statutes of limitation, like analogous rules of choice applicable to statutes or contractual provisions generally, is a rule of last resort
Portercare Adventist Health Sys. v. Lego
286 P.3d 525 (Colo. 2012) Cited 22 times
In Portercare, the court held that the six year statute of limitations applies to implied in fact contracts for liquidated medical expenses.
Neuromonitoring Assocs. v. Centura Health Corp.
351 P.3d 486 (Colo. App. 2012) Cited 14 times
Court of Appeals No. 11CA1391 08-16-2012 Neuromonitoring Associates, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Centura Health Corporation, Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado, and Portercare Adventist Health System, Defendants-Appellees. Robinson Waters & O'Dorisio, P.C., Steven L. Waters, Brian G. McConaty, Bradley G. Robinson, Kimberly A. Bruetsch, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant Kutak Rock, LLP, Chad T. Nitta, Mark L. Sabey, Blair E. Kanis, Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellees LOEB City and County
Davis v. King
560 F. App'x 756 (10th Cir. 2014) Cited 11 times
Holding that the district court had supplemental jurisdiction to resolve an attorney lien dispute, even when the attorney in question had only represented the plaintiff before the EEOC and not in federal court, because the initial EEOC action was "an integral part" of the subsequent case
Section 13-80-101 - General limitation of actions - three years
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-101 Cited 218 times
Stating that "[a]ll contract actions" must be commenced "within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not thereafter"
Section 13-80-108 - When a cause of action accrues
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-108 Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Explaining when a cause of action accrues for bodily injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle
Section 13-80-103 - General limitation of actions - one year
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103 Cited 90 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring that "[a]ll actions for any penalty or forfeiture of any penal statutes" be commenced within one year after the action accrues
Section 13-80-103.5 - General limitation of actions - six years
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103.5 Cited 76 times 2 Legal Analyses
Applying six-year statute of limitations to "[a]ll actions to recover a liquidated debt or an unliquidated, determinable amount of money due"

BlueRadios, Inc. v. Kopin Corporation, Inc

30 Cited authorities

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding that a new statute of limitations starts to run with each missed payment or when payment of the debt is accelerated

Holding that monthly payments were divisible from each other and that a new cause of action for breach accrued periodically

Holding that acceleration requires a clear, unequivocal act evincing an intent to invoke the creditor's contractual option to accelerate

Finding that a material breach "goes to the root of the matter or essence of the contract"

Holding that rule favoring longer, rather than shorter, of two arguably applicable statutes of limitation, like analogous rules of choice applicable to statutes or contractual provisions generally, is a rule of last resort

In Portercare, the court held that the six year statute of limitations applies to implied in fact contracts for liquidated medical expenses.

Holding that the district court had supplemental jurisdiction to resolve an attorney lien dispute, even when the attorney in question had only represented the plaintiff before the EEOC and not in federal court, because the initial EEOC action was "an integral part" of the subsequent case

Stating that "[a]ll contract actions" must be commenced "within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not thereafter"

Explaining when a cause of action accrues for bodily injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle

Requiring that "[a]ll actions for any penalty or forfeiture of any penal statutes" be commenced within one year after the action accrues

Applying six-year statute of limitations to "[a]ll actions to recover a liquidated debt or an unliquidated, determinable amount of money due"