§Why CasetextPricing

BlueRadios, Inc. v. Kopin Corporation, Inc

MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

11 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 235,761 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 215,930 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. Wright ex rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

    259 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2001)   Cited 1,114 times
    Stating that "post-judgment motions filed within ten days of the final judgment should, where possible, be construed as 59(e) motions to avoid otherwise endless hassles over proper characterization"

  4. Sulca v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    77 P.3d 897 (Colo. App. 2003)   Cited 36 times
    In Sulca, another uninsured-motorist case, a driver caused an automobile accident and, before leaving the accident scene, told the "insured that he did not have automobile insurance and he did not own the car he was driving."

  5. Extreme Construction Co. v. RCG Glenwood, LLC

    310 P.3d 246 (Colo. App. 2012)   Cited 8 times
    Declining to review where party "provides no supporting argument or authority for specific assertion"

  6. Grant v. Pharmacia Upjohn Co.

    314 F.3d 488 (10th Cir. 2002)   Cited 14 times
    Deeming waived a claim raised before the district court but not briefed on appeal

  7. In re Application of Church

    833 P.2d 813 (Colo. App. 1992)   Cited 16 times
    Distinguishing and declining to apply Lovell

  8. NAGY v. LANDAU

    807 P.2d 1227 (Colo. App. 1990)   Cited 13 times
    Stating that section 13–80–103.5 requires “all actions of debt founded upon any contract ... to be commenced within six years after the cause of action accrued”

  9. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,071 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  10. Section 13-80-101 - General limitation of actions - three years

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-101   Cited 218 times
    Stating that "[a]ll contract actions" must be commenced "within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not thereafter"

  11. Section 13-80-108 - When a cause of action accrues

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-108   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Explaining when a cause of action accrues for bodily injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle