44 Cited authorities

  1. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,891 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  2. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.

    564 U.S. 786 (2011)   Cited 485 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even if violent video games cause aggression, a state could not prohibit their sale to children
  3. United States v. Alvarez

    567 U.S. 709 (2012)   Cited 270 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment prohibits prosecution for a false claim that the speaker held a congressional medal of honor
  4. Howell v. New York Post Co.

    81 N.Y.2d 115 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 1,420 times
    Holding that the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: " extreme and outrageous conduct; intent to cause, or disregard of a substantial probability of causing, severe emotional distress; a causal connection between the conduct and injury; and severe emotional distress."
  5. Time, Inc. v. Hill

    385 U.S. 374 (1967)   Cited 712 times
    Holding constitutional a state law imposing civil liability for malicious false statements that invade a private individual's right of privacy
  6. Winters v. New York

    333 U.S. 507 (1948)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a statute imposes criminal penalties, the standard of certainty involved in vagueness review is higher
  7. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

    433 U.S. 562 (1977)   Cited 346 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding a state may privilege the press by exempting it from a right-of-publicity tort
  8. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson

    343 U.S. 495 (1952)   Cited 627 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that movies are a protected form of speech
  9. Rogers v. Grimaldi

    875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 367 times   107 Legal Analyses
    Holding that title of movie "Ginger and Fred" contained "expressive element" implicating First Amendment
  10. Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing

    94 N.Y.2d 436 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that no appropriation claim may lie where “plaintiff's photograph is used to illustrate a newsworthy article”