§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Julio Peguero-Sanchez, Appellant.

Brief

10 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Galloway

    54 N.Y.2d 396 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 1,426 times
    Agreeing that reversal of a conviction "'is properly shunned when the [prosecutorial] misconduct has not substantially prejudiced a defendant's trial'"

  2. People v. Harris

    57 N.Y.2d 335 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 306 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that trial court properly admitted witness's testimony on rebuttal to refute defendant's direct testimony

  3. People v. Tonge

    93 N.Y.2d 838 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 142 times
    Noting that failure to specify the basis for a general objection to a remark on summation leaves the argument unpreserved

  4. People v. Kims

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7196 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 61 times

    10-23-2014 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant–Respondent, v. Stanley R. KIMS, II, Respondent–Appellant. Cindy F. Intschert, District Attorney, Watertown (Harmony A. Healy of counsel), and Karen F. McGee and Hannah E.C. Moore, New York Prosecutors Training Institute, Albany, for appellant-respondent. Davison Law Office, PLLC, Canandaigua (Mark C. Davison of counsel), for respondent-appellant. RIVERA, J. Cindy F. Intschert, District Attorney, Watertown (Harmony A. Healy of counsel), and

  5. People v. Brosnan

    32 N.Y.2d 254 (N.Y. 1973)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying the plain view rule and the incidental to arrest rule

  6. People v. Barton

    110 A.D.3d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 19 times

    2013-10-30 The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Larry BARTON, appellant. Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsí of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel), for respondent. MARK C. DILLON Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsí of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano

  7. People v. McCall

    80 A.D.3d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 8 times
    Referencing suppression hearing

  8. People v. Dyer

    60 A.D.3d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

    No. 2006-10975. March 3, 2009. Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Holdman, J.), rendered November 9, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to a determinate term of six years' imprisonment, followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Guy Oksenhendler, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Judith

  9. People v. Harris

    232 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 4 times

    October 7, 1996. Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mastro, J.), rendered February 18, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Before: Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the trial court did not err in permitting the People to introduce rebuttal evidence concerning the defendant's changed appearance at the

  10. Marshall et al. v. Davies

    78 N.Y. 414 (N.Y. 1879)   Cited 67 times
    In Marshall v. Davies (78 N.Y. 414) the Court of Appeals held that "[r]ebutting evidence * * * means, not merely evidence which contradicts the witnesses on the opposite side and corroborates those of the party who began, but evidence in denial of some affirmative fact which the answering party has endeavored to prove" (supra, at 420).