14 Cited authorities

United States v. Hatter
532 U.S. 557 (2001) Cited 123 times
Holding that where pursuant to statute taxes were withheld from judicial paychecks, a separate cause of action accrued with each individual paycheck under the continuing claim doctrine
In re Maron
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8573 (N.Y. 2010) Cited 69 times
Finding link between legislative and judicial pay increases unconstitutional under New York state constitution
DePascale v. State
211 N.J. 40 (N.J. 2012) Cited 28 times
Recognizing general principles of necessity
McBryde v. U.S.
299 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2002) Cited 19 times
Holding that payment under judicial litigation expenses statute is mandatory, rather than discretionary, "when the statutory conditions are met, and it is therefore money-mandating for purposes of vesting the Court of Federal Claims with jurisdiction under the Tucker Act"
Roe v. Board of Trustees
65 A.D.3d 1211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009) Cited 9 times
No. 2008-08545. September 22, 2009. In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants' resolution terminating the plaintiffs paid health care benefits is null and void, and for a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from terminating the plaintiffs paid health care benefits, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated August 18, 2008, as awarded the plaintiff a permanent injunction
Lippman v. Board of Educ
66 N.Y.2d 313 (N.Y. 1985) Cited 35 times
In Lippman, an employee challenged a resolution of the Board of Education that reduced the school district's contribution to retiree health premiums from 100 percent to 50 percent.
Suttlehan v. Town of New Windsor
31 Misc. 3d 290 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)
No. 10701-2009. January 19, 2011. Philip H. Schnabel, Chester, for plaintiff. Michael D. Blythe, Town Attorney, New Windsor, for defendants. OPINION OF THE COURT LEWIS J. LUBELL, J. Plaintiff, Donald J. Suttlehan, was first duly elected Town Justice of the Town of New Windsor (the Town) in November 1979. He served in that capacity from January 1, 1980 through his July 31, 2009 retirement. Suttlehan brings this action against the Town, its supervisor and Town Board members personally, in connection
Robinson v. Sullivan
905 F.2d 1199 (8th Cir. 1990) Cited 3 times
No. 89-1630. Submitted February 15, 1990. Decided June 21, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 14, 1990. Richard J. Bruckner, Omaha, Neb., for appellant. Dwight G. Rabuse, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. Before WOLLMAN and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and WATERS, District Judge. The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting by designation
Matter of Gordon v. Monaghan
130 N.E.2d 882 (N.Y. 1955) Cited 7 times
In Gordon, the petitioner police officer was dismissed from the NYPD after the officer filed his application for retirement.
Matter of Pisko v. Mintz
262 N.Y. 176 (N.Y. 1933) Cited 25 times
In Pisko v. Mintz (262 N.Y. 176) an apartment house janitor who occupied an apartment on the premises was suffocated as the result of a fire which originated in his bed.
Section 52:14-17.31a - Employee permitted to waive benefits coverage under SHBP
N.J. Stat. § 52:14-17.31a Cited 1 times
a. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, an employer other than the State which participates in the State Health Benefits Program, established pursuant to P.L. 1961, c.49 (C.52:14-17.25 et seq.), may allow any employee who is eligible for other health care coverage to waive coverage under the State Health Benefits Program to which the employee is entitled by virtue of employment with the employer. The waiver shall be in such form as the Director of the Division of Pensions

Eileen Bransten,, et al., Respondents,v.State of New York, Appellant.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that where pursuant to statute taxes were withheld from judicial paychecks, a separate cause of action accrued with each individual paycheck under the continuing claim doctrine

Finding link between legislative and judicial pay increases unconstitutional under New York state constitution

Recognizing general principles of necessity

Holding that payment under judicial litigation expenses statute is mandatory, rather than discretionary, "when the statutory conditions are met, and it is therefore money-mandating for purposes of vesting the Court of Federal Claims with jurisdiction under the Tucker Act"

In Lippman, an employee challenged a resolution of the Board of Education that reduced the school district's contribution to retiree health premiums from 100 percent to 50 percent.

In Gordon, the petitioner police officer was dismissed from the NYPD after the officer filed his application for retirement.

In Pisko v. Mintz (262 N.Y. 176) an apartment house janitor who occupied an apartment on the premises was suffocated as the result of a fire which originated in his bed.