11 Cited authorities

  1. Billingy v. Blagrove

    84 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 35 times

    Nos. 2010-11532, 2010-11538. May 10, 2011. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated April 9, 2010, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 18, 2010, which denied his motion for leave to reargue and renew. Cheven Keely Hatzis, New York, N.Y. (William B. Stock of counsel), for appellant. Ginsburg Misk

  2. Grieshaber v. City of Albany

    279 A.D.2d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 23 times
    Requiring "justifiable reliance" in New York
  3. Chamberlain v. Amato

    259 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 23 times

    March 31, 1999 Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Partnership Law. Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and new trial granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment, entered following a bench trial, dismissing the complaints to enforce a $150,000 promissory note made by Joseph Amato (defendant), to compel defendant to account for certain partnership assets, and to set aside, as fraudulent

  4. People v. Dicks

    100 A.D.3d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 7 times

    2012-11-20 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Randy DICKS, Defendant–Appellant. Law Offices of Douglas G. Rankin, P.C., Brooklyn (Douglas G. Rankin of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Britta Gilmore of counsel), for respondent. TOM Law Offices of Douglas G. Rankin, P.C., Brooklyn (Douglas G. Rankin of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Britta Gilmore of counsel), for respondent. TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS,

  5. People v. Torres

    118 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 21 times

    March 24, 1986 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence, J.). Judgment affirmed. The defendant was charged with participating in a conspiracy to burn down competing supermarkets and grocery stores. A total of eight fires were set. The defendant, in addition to being convicted of conspiracy to set the fires, was also convicted of arson and reckless endangerment charges in connection with six of the incidents. The defendant's argument that the acquittal on arson charges in connection with

  6. La Rue v. Crandall

    254 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 8 times

    October 29, 1998 Appeal from the Family Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.). The principal question on this appeal is whether Family Court erred in finding a material and substantial change in circumstances sufficient to deny petitioner any and all contact or visitation with his children. The parties, whose relationship began when petitioner and respondent were ages 22 and 14, respectively, have two children: Bruce (born in 1984) and Danielle (born in 1988). They separated in 1988 and divorced

  7. People v. Hamilton

    304 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

    966 April 29, 2003. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered November 19, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed. Zachary H. Johnson, for respondent. Jody Ratner, for defendant-appellant. Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach, JJ. The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence

  8. United States v. White

    223 F.2d 674 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 12 times

    No. 320, Docket 23517. Argued May 6, 1955. Decided June 10, 1955. Arnold D. Roseman, New York City, for defendant-appellant (Harry Silver, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief). J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., for Southern Dist. of N.Y., New York City, for appellee, Walter L. Stratton, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MEDINA, Circuit Judge and DIMOCK, District Judge. DIMOCK, District Judge. Appellant was convicted of the sale of narcotics. The evidence against him consisted

  9. Harmon v. Matthews

    27 N.Y.S.2d 656 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1941)   Cited 14 times
    In Harmon v. Matthews (supra, p. 659) it was stated: "Undoubtedly, unless some other legal method is provided by its law, before a member can be expelled upon charges from a trade union or any voluntary unincorporated association, he is entitled to have the charges made known to him.
  10. Mahaney v. Carr

    67 N.E. 903 (N.Y. 1903)   Cited 34 times
    In Mahaney v. Carr (175 N.Y. 454) we refused to enforce by specific performance a parol contract between the grandfather and the father of an infant, whereby the latter surrendered his rights to the child and the former adopted her as his daughter and agreed that upon his death she should have one-fourth interest in all the property he should thereafter acquire.
  11. Rule 1003 - Admissibility of Duplicates

    Fed. R. Evid. 1003   Cited 489 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Permitting duplicates