§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.John F. Haggerty, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. Davis v. Alaska

    415 U.S. 308 (1974)   Cited 5,683 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this confrontation right is applicable to state and federal defendants alike

  2. United States v. Nixon

    418 U.S. 683 (1974)   Cited 4,078 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254

  3. Schozer v. Wm. Penn Life Ins. Co.

    84 N.Y.2d 639 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 193 times
    Holding that the proponent of secondary evidence must preliminarily establish that it "is authentic and correctly reflects the contents of the original"

  4. United States v. Lee

    106 U.S. 196 (1882)   Cited 605 times
    Holding that landowner could bring suit for ejectment against federal officials who took possession of land without bringing condemnation proceedings

  5. People v. Hamilton

    304 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

    966 April 29, 2003. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered November 19, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed. Zachary H. Johnson, for respondent. Jody Ratner, for defendant-appellant. Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach, JJ. The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence

  6. United States v. Holley

    463 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 5 times
    In Holley, citing to Haymes, we stated that "[i]t is well-established in this Circuit that a disjunctive statute may be plead conjunctively and proved disjunctively.

  7. Harmon v. Matthews

    27 N.Y.S.2d 656 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1941)   Cited 14 times
    In Harmon v. Matthews (supra, p. 659) it was stated: "Undoubtedly, unless some other legal method is provided by its law, before a member can be expelled upon charges from a trade union or any voluntary unincorporated association, he is entitled to have the charges made known to him.

  8. Mahaney v. Carr

    67 N.E. 903 (N.Y. 1903)   Cited 34 times
    In Mahaney v. Carr (175 N.Y. 454) we refused to enforce by specific performance a parol contract between the grandfather and the father of an infant, whereby the latter surrendered his rights to the child and the former adopted her as his daughter and agreed that upon his death she should have one-fourth interest in all the property he should thereafter acquire.

  9. Kearney v. Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y

    92 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1883)   Cited 16 times

    Argued May 8, 1883 Decided June 5, 1883 James M. Lyddy for appellant. D.J. Dean for respondent. RAPALLO, J. The alleged employment by the sheriff, pursuant to chapter 480 of the Laws of 1860, of Scanlon, the plaintiff's assignor, to publish the election notice in the newspaper entitled " The Irish Republic," lay at the foundation of the plaintiff's supposed cause of action. The fact of such employment was put in issue by the answer. The plaintiff was the only witness called to prove it, and he testified