§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Arbitration between the City of Oswego, Appellant, -and- Oswego City Firefighters Association, Local 2707, Respondent.

Brief

40 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,542 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey

    431 U.S. 1 (1977)   Cited 1,025 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a contractual impairment unreasonable in part because for "over a half century" "the need for mass transportation in the New York metropolitan area was not a new development, and the likelihood that publicly owned commuter railroads would produce substantial deficits was well known"

  3. Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas Power Light

    459 U.S. 400 (1983)   Cited 828 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law regulating intrastate price of natural gas did not substantially impair private party's contract rights because industry was heavily regulated and company had no reasonable expectation of receiving windfall from deregulated prices

  4. General Motors Corp. v. Romein

    503 U.S. 181 (1992)   Cited 545 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding there was no contractual relationship regarding the statutory terms at issue, and therefore no violation of the Contract Clause

  5. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7480 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 369 times
    In Roberts, this Court rejected DHCR's long-standing statutory interpretation and concluded that luxury deregulation was unavailable in any building during receipt of J–51 benefits (13 N.Y.3d at 285–287, 890 N.Y.S.2d 388, 918 N.E.2d 900).

  6. N.Y. State Corr. Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York

    94 N.Y.2d 321 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 327 times
    Affirming arbitration award reinstating employee to his position as correctional officer, with full pay, notwithstanding the employee's having flown a Nazi flag on the porch of his home

  7. Matter of Sprinzen

    46 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 393 times
    Approving arbitrator's award enforcing restrictive employment covenant

  8. In Matter of Kowaleski v. N.Y. Dept.

    16 N.Y.3d 85 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that Arbitrator exceeded his power by failing to consider a parties retaliation defense as required by Civil Service Law § 75-b

  9. In re N.Y.C. Transit Auth. v. Transport Workers U

    99 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 136 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "although the awards directed reinstatement of the employees, they clearly did not disregard safety concerns and the seriousness of the breaches of safety rules. Instead, they imposed serious financial sanctions in both cases"

  10. In the Matter of Johnstown

    99 N.Y.2d 273 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 62 times

    155, 156 Decided December 17, 2002. Appeal, in the first above-entitled proceeding, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered December 20, 2001, which (1) reversed, on the law, an order of the Supreme Court (Robert P. Best, J.) entered in Fulton County, granting a petition to stay arbitration relating to the retirement provision of the parties' collective bargaining agreement, and (2) dismissed the