45 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 68,888 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court must presume trier of fact resolved all inferences in favor of the prosecution "even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record"
  2. Katz v. United States

    389 U.S. 347 (1967)   Cited 11,123 times   70 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"
  3. Colorado v. Bertine

    479 U.S. 367 (1987)   Cited 1,547 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the decision to seize need be "on the basis of something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity"
  4. Ulster County Court v. Allen

    442 U.S. 140 (1979)   Cited 1,671 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that criminal defendants could not mount a facial challenge to a statute that had been constitutionally applied at their trial
  5. Florida v. Wells

    495 U.S. 1 (1990)   Cited 867 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the inventory "search was not sufficiently regulated to satisfy the Fourth Amendment" because "the Florida Highway Patrol had no policy whatever with respect to the opening of closed containers encountered during an inventory search"
  6. Berger v. United States

    295 U.S. 78 (1935)   Cited 3,761 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding there was no prejudice when four defendants were tried for a single conspiracy and two separate conspiracies were proven
  7. People v. Galloway

    54 N.Y.2d 396 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 1,398 times
    Agreeing that reversal of a conviction "`is properly shunned when the [prosecutorial] misconduct has not substantially prejudiced a defendant's trial'"
  8. United States v. Jeffers

    342 U.S. 48 (1951)   Cited 976 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no person can have a legally protected interest in contraband per se
  9. U.S. v. Duguay

    93 F.3d 346 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 146 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding impoundment unconstitutional when another occupant of the vehicle was present at the arrest and could "provide for the speedy and efficient removal of the car from public thoroughfares or parking lots"
  10. People v. Johnson

    1 N.Y.3d 252 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 88 times
    Following a lawful arrest of the driver of an automobile that must then be impounded, the police may conduct an inventory search of the vehicle