§Why CasetextPricing

The People ex rel. Eduardo Baez, Appellant,v.Superintendent, Queensboro Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Brief

25 Cited authorities

  1. Spencer v. Kemna

    523 U.S. 1 (1998)   Cited 5,568 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an issue is moot when "there is nothing for us to remedy"

  2. Matter Hearst Corp. v. Clyne

    50 N.Y.2d 707 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 1,594 times
    Holding that courts are normally precluded from considering questions that, once alive, have become moot by change of circumstances

  3. Callanan v. United States

    364 U.S. 587 (1961)   Cited 446 times
    Holding that defendant convicted of obstructing commerce by extortion and conspiracy to commit the same had committed “two offenses” such that it was within trial court's discretion to fix separate sentences

  4. Wilson v. Terhune

    319 F.3d 477 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 196 times
    Holding that collateral consequences are not presumed in prison disciplinary proceedings

  5. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 407 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  6. Coleman v. Daines

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7222 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 113 times
    Discussing a "hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and 42 USC § 1983 action"

  7. Matter of Biondo v. New York State Board of Parole

    60 N.Y.2d 832 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 216 times
    In Biondo v. New York State Board of Parole, 458 N.E.2d 371 (N.Y. 1983), which theCarter court cited, but did not discuss or explicitly overrule, the Court of Appeals rejected a lower court holding that "the running of the statutory period beg[ins] to run immediately upon the issuance of the determination" being challenged.

  8. In Matter of Murray v. Goord

    1 N.Y.3d 29 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 87 times
    Finding DOCCS' only option is to comply with the last order of commitment

  9. People v. Buss

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9851 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 59 times
    In Buss we analyzed section 70.30 based on the language of the statute, and applied our interpretation of the requirements of section 70.30 to SORA. Nothing in the case suggests that our interpretation of section 70.30 was dependent on SORA, or limited to SORA cases.

  10. Matter of Anonymous v. N.Y. City Health Hosps. Corp.

    70 N.Y.2d 972 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 60 times
    In Anonymous, the petitioner challenged her continued retention after involuntary commitment to a psychiatric facility pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.27 (id. at 973).

  11. Section 500.11 - Alternative procedure for selected appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.11   Cited 536 times

    (a) On its own motion, the court may review selected appeals by an alternative procedure. Such appeals shall be determined on the intermediate appellate court record or appendix and briefs, the writings in the courts below and additional letter submissions on the merits. The clerk of the court shall notify all parties by letter when an appeal has been selected for review pursuant to this section. Appellant may request such review in its preliminary appeal statement. Respondent may request such review