§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Kerri Roberts, Respondent.

Brief

37 Cited authorities

  1. Smith v. United States

    508 U.S. 223 (1993)   Cited 1,172 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a person who sells a firearm "uses" it within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) "even though those actions do not involve using the firearm as a weapon"

  2. Muscarello v. United States

    524 U.S. 125 (1998)   Cited 686 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "us[ing] or carr[ying] a firearm" occurs when the firearm is locked in the glove compartment or trunk of a vehicle that the defendant is driving

  3. Moskal v. United States

    498 U.S. 103 (1990)   Cited 559 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule of lenity is not triggered because it is "possible to articulate" a narrower construction of a statute

  4. Lewis v. United States

    445 U.S. 55 (1980)   Cited 736 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a felon-in-possession "prosecution does not open the predicate conviction to a new form of collateral attack"

  5. Bifulco v. United States

    447 U.S. 381 (1980)   Cited 560 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule of lenity "applies not only to interpretations of the substantive ambit of criminal prohibitions, but also to the penalties they impose"

  6. Leader v. Maroney

    97 N.Y.2d 95 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 772 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts have discretion to decide whether to extend time to serve for good cause shown or in the interest of justice

  7. United States v. Granderson

    511 U.S. 39 (1994)   Cited 255 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discrete, differently worded probation and supervised release provisions should not be interpreted in pari materia

  8. Robers v. United States

    572 U.S. 639 (2014)   Cited 129 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because money is fungible, it "need not be the very same bills or check" that are returned to a victim

  9. Shaw v. United States

    137 S. Ct. 462 (2016)   Cited 62 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 requires the intent to "deceive the bank and deprive it of something of value"

  10. People v. Santi

    3 N.Y.3d 234 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 159 times
    In People v. Santi, 3 N.Y.3d 234, 243, 785 N.Y.S.2d 405, 818 N.E.2d 1146 (2004), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the long established policy that, " '[i]n implementing a statute, the courts must of necessity examine the purpose of the statute and determine the intention of the Legislature.' " citing, Willams v. Williams, 23 N.Y.2d 592, 598, 298 N.Y.S.2d 473, 246 N.E.2d 333 (1969).

  11. Section 943.201 - Unauthorized use of an individual's personal identifying information or documents

    Wis. Stat. § 943.201   Cited 40 times   9 Legal Analyses

    (1) In this section: (a) "Personal identification document" means any of the following: 1. A document containing personal identifying information. 2. An individual's card or plate, if it can be used, alone or in conjunction with another access device, to obtain money, goods, services, or any other thing of value or benefit, or if it can be used to initiate a transfer of funds. 3. Any other device that is unique to, assigned to, or belongs to an individual and that is intended to be used to access

  12. Section 266:37E - Identity fraud; definitions; punishment; warrantless arrest

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266 § 37E   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting identity theft

  13. Section 14-113.20 - Identity theft

    N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-113.20   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) A person who knowingly obtains, possesses, or uses identifying information of another person, living or dead, with the intent to fraudulently represent that the person is the other person for the purposes of making financial or credit transactions in the other person's name, to obtain anything of value, benefit, or advantage, or for the purpose of avoiding legal consequences is guilty of a felony punishable as provided in G.S. 14-113.22(a). (b) The term "identifying information" as used in this

  14. Section 3 - Massachusetts boundary line

    N.Y. State Law § 3   Cited 9 times

    The boundary line between the states of New York and Massachusetts is as follows: Beginning at bound one, a granite monument set in ledge on the side of a wooded mountain peak six hundred and nine feet east of Ryan bush road, in latitude forty-two degrees two minutes fifty-eight and four hundred and twenty-seven thousandths seconds north of the equator, and longitude seventy-three degrees twenty-nine minutes fifteen and nine hundred and fifty-nine thousandths seconds west from Greenwich, and marking