§

Wonder State Manufacturing Co.

141 N.L.R.B. 1217 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Wonder State Manufacturing Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,673 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCatron

    216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.

  4. Pittsburgh S.S. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    180 F.2d 731 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In Pittsburgh S.S. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 731, 735, affirmed 340 U.S. 498, 71 S.Ct. 453, 95 L.Ed. 479, the Court of Appeals, under a somewhat similar factual situation, stated, "With reference to the right of free speech the legislative history shows that the amendment embodied in § 8(c) of the Taft-Hartley Act was specifically intended to prevent the Board from using unrelated non-coercive expressions of opinion on union matters as evidence of a general course of unfair labor conduct."

  5. Wells, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    162 F.2d 457 (9th Cir. 1947)   Cited 12 times

    No. 11388. June 17, 1947. Petition for Review, and Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Wells, Incorporated to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board consolidated with a proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce order against Wells Incorporated. Order modified and enforcement decree granted. Louis H. Callister, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioner. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Associate

  6. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"