§

White-Evans Service Co., Inc. And Its Alter Ego Amco Elevators, Inc.

285 N.L.R.B. 81 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
White-Evans Service Co., Inc. And Its Alter Ego Amco Elevators, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc. v. Carpenters Local Union

    464 U.S. 932 (1983)   Cited 209 times
    Critizing Iowa Electric and Ketchikan

  3. Carpenters Local U #1846 v. Pratt-Farnsworth

    690 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that a § 301 claim for breach of contract may be stated under an alter ego theory where the defendant had not signed the CBA

  4. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  6. General Teamsters, Ch., No. 782 v. N.L.R.B

    373 F.2d 661 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 20110, 20148, 20253. Argued December 23, 1966. Decided February 7, 1967. Mr. Sheldon M. Charone, Chicago, Ill., with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20,110 and intervenor in No. 20,148. Mr. David S. Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for intervenor in No. 20,148. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel,

  7. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions