West Penn Power Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  4. Hertz Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    105 F.3d 868 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-3621, 96-3000 Argued June 11, 1996. Opinion Filed January 28, 1997. As Amended February 6, 1997. Frank B. Shuster (Argued), Costangy, Brooks Smith, L.L.C., Atlanta, for Petitioner. Peter Winkler, Supervisory Attorney, Vincent J. Falvo, Jr. (Argued), Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, United

  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    691 F.2d 953 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times

    No. 80-2175. October 27, 1982. T. H. Eskridge of Boesche, McDermott Eskridge, Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner. Victoria A. Higman, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel and Collis Suzanne Stocking, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C., with her on the brief), for respondent and cross-petitioner. Before HOLLOWAY, McWILLIAMS and BARRETT, Circuit Judges. BARRETT

  6. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B

    720 F.2d 789 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining "absence and tardiness records are confidential" where "many of the reasons given in the absence and tardiness records are of a highly personal nature" including that "one Company employee suffered from diarrhea for two days, and was absent for an additional five days because in ‘treating for hemroids [, the employee] used too hot of water and too much epsom salts, burnt the skin.’ "