Waterman of Puerto Rico-U.S.A., Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  2. I. B. of Teamsters, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.2d 665 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 14357, 14411. June 16, 1960. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the pleadings for petitioner in No. 14357. Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, were on the pleadings for respondent in No. 14357 and petitioner in No. 14411. Messrs. Arthur M. Kuhl, Washington, D.C., Richard G. Kleindienst, Phoenix, Ariz

  3. Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 382 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13743. March 4, 1963. James F. Flanagan, Harold T. Halfpenny, Richard F. Hahn, Mary M. Shaw, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. This matter is before us on petition of Trumbull Asphalt

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Dorsey Trailers

    179 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 17 times

    No. 12750. January 30, 1950. T. Lowry Whittaker, Chief Legal Officer, National Labor Relations Bd., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bentley G. Byrnes, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Based upon findings that respondent had engaged, and

  5. Marquandt v. Boston Y.W.C.A

    184 N.E. 287 (Mass. 1933)   Cited 21 times

    November 16, 1932. February 13, 1933. Present: RUGG, C.J., PIERCE, FIELD, LUMMUS, JJ. Agency, Scope of authority. Evidence, Presumptions and burden of proof. At the trial of an action against a corporation for breach of a contract to sell certain second hand machinery to the plaintiff, there was evidence that the plaintiff made to the defendant's engineer an offer of $200 for the machinery; that the engineer replied that he would have to find out "whether that was all right"; that, after telephoning