§

Valley Date Gardens, Inc.

144 N.L.R.B. 1544 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Valley Date Gardens, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. Superior Engraving Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 44 times
    In Superior Engraving Co. v. National LaborRel. Bd., 183 F.2d 783, 789 (7 Cir. 1950), certiorari denied 340 U.S. 930, 71 S.Ct. 490, 95 L.Ed. 671 (1951), the court recently declined to apply Sohn v. Waterson, supra, to an amendatory provision in the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), that "no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.

    182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union

    274 F.2d 376 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, 274 F.2d 376, 379 (3d Cir. 1960), the court upheld the union's refusal to bargain where management had placed an ex-union official on its panel for the express purpose of "putting one over" on the union.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Dalton Tel. Co.

    187 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 14 times
    In Dalton Telephone, however, the court strongly suggested that the company's insistence on the union registration was simply a ploy to avoid reducing to writing an agreement to which the parties had already agreed.

  6. National Lab. Rel. B. v. Worcester Woolen Mills

    170 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1948)   Cited 12 times

    No. 4346. October 4, 1948. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against Worcester Woolen Mills Corporation. Order enforced. Louis Libbin, of Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand, and Rose Mary Filipowicz, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Howard W. Cowee, of Worcester, Mass. (Simon G. Friedman, of Worcester, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Roscoe Skipper

    213 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14885. June 18, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott. General Counsel, Owsley Vose, John C. Rohrbaugh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Kontz Bennett, Waycross, Ga. (Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. This small tempest

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lambert

    250 F.2d 801 (5th Cir. 1958)

    No. 14568. January 14, 1958. Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Julius G. Serot, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Emil Corenbleth, Dallas, Tex., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. By petition filed in this court March 23, 1957, and upon allegations that respondents had disobeyed, and failed and refused to comply with, the decree of this court entered pursuant to its opinion in