§

Valley Community Services

314 N.L.R.B. 903 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Valley Community Services

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.

    376 U.S. 473 (1964)   Cited 426 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 339 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  7. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  8. N.L.R.B. v. General Wood Preserving Co.

    905 F.2d 803 (4th Cir. 1990)   Cited 15 times
    Finding a successor liable for the unfair labor practices of the predecessor

  9. Lebanon Steel Foundry v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    130 F.2d 404 (D.C. Cir. 1942)   Cited 12 times

    No. 7990. Decided June 29, 1942. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 12, 1942. See ___ U.S. ___, 63 S.Ct. 58, 87 L.Ed. ___. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Lebanon Steel Foundry against National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the board. Enforcement ordered. Mr. Hugh P. McFadden, of Bethlehem, Pa., for petitioner. Mr. Ernest A. Gross, Assistant General Counsel, with whom Mr. Robert B. Watts, General Counsel, Mr