Utah Plumbing and Heating Contractors Association

Nathanson v. Labor Board
344 U.S. 25 (1952) Cited 279 times
Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"
Utah Plumbing and Heating Con. v. N.L.R.B
294 F.2d 165 (10th Cir. 1961) Cited 5 times
No. 6617. August 24, 1961. Louis H. Callister, Salt Lake City, Utah (Callister Fullmer, Salt Lake City, Utah, were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. Utah Plumbing and Heating Contractors Association, with its principal
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.F. Shuck Const
243 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1957) Cited 7 times
No. 15084. January 15, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Morris A. Solomon, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Lycette, Diamond Sylvester, Lyle I. Iversen, Seattle, Wash., for respondent Associated Gen. Contractors of America. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, and MURRAY, District Judge. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks our enforcement of its order finding the respondent