§

United Buckingham Freight Lines

168 N.L.R.B. 684 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
United Buckingham Freight Lines

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Howell Chev. Co. v. Labor Board

    346 U.S. 482 (1953)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a car retailer is subject to Commerce Clause as an "'integral part' of General Motors' national system of distribution."

  5. Colson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 128 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 35 times
    Finding that a repudiation three weeks after unlawful conduct was inadequate

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

    204 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 53 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

  7. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Trimfit of Calif

    211 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times
    Affirming an NLRB order requiring reinstatement of pro-Union former employees

  9. Retail Clerks Union, L. No. 1179 v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 186 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    No. 20781. March 28, 1967. Roland C. Davis, Philip Paul Bowe, Carroll, Davis, Burdick McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Lawrence M. Joseph, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before HAMLEY and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge. This matter

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Kellogg's Inc.

    347 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 2 times

    No. 19734. May 21, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Joseph C. Thackery, Sol Hirsh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, Weston Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent. Before HAMLIN, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Respondent, Kellogg's Inc., processes and sells feed, seeds, fertilizers and kindred commodities at Nampa, Idaho. On October