United Assn. Pipe Fitters Local 455
3 Cited authorities
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 timesHolding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under ยง 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 664 (1967) Cited 29 timesIn Houston Insulation Contractors' Ass'n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664, 87 S.Ct. 1278, 18 L.Ed.2d 389 (1967), the Court, relying largely on the reasoning in National Woodwork, held that a work preservation agreement between a company and a local union could be effectuated by another local of the same union.
Northeastern Ind. Bldg. Const. v. N.L.R.B
352 F.2d 696 (D.C. Cir. 1965) Cited 13 timesNo. 19164. Argued June 11, 1965. Decided July 28, 1965. Mr. Bernard M. Mamet, Chicago, Ill., with whom Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Mrs. Linda R. Sher, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before DANAHER, BURGER and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges. McGOWAN, Circuit Judge: