§

Union Nacional de Trabajadores

219 N.L.R.B. 414 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Union Nacional de Trabajadores

9 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.

    312 U.S. 287 (1941)   Cited 382 times
    Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347

    417 U.S. 1 (1974)   Cited 129 times
    Holding when a remedy is found to be an abuse of discretion "remand to the agency for reconsideration ... is ordinarily the reviewing court's proper course"

  5. Bland v. Mchann

    410 U.S. 966 (1973)   Cited 80 times

    No. 72-707. March 5, 1973, October TERM, 1972. Certiorari Denied C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 463 F. 2d 21.

  6. Communications Workers v. N.L.R.B

    362 U.S. 479 (1960)   Cited 70 times
    Striking part of an NLRB order requiring a union to refrain from coercing employees of "any other employer" where the NLRB had found that the union had coerced only the employees of the named employer

  7. National Cash Register Company v. N.L.R.B

    466 F.2d 945 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 16 times
    Finding the union liable for the unlawful picketing of its members, and deeming it significant that the union made no effort to disavow either the union hall statements of its agents or the picket line incidents

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Oil, Chem. Atomic Wkrs. Int. U

    476 F.2d 1031 (1st Cir. 1973)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 72-1347, 72-1379. April 17, 1973. Alan H. Randall, Hato Rey, P. R., with whom Edward M. Borges and O'Neill Borges, Hato Rey, P. R., were on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence D. Levien, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsels, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Ginoris Vizcarra De Lopez-Lay, San Juan, P. R., with whom Lopez-Lay Vizcarra, San Juan, P. R.

  9. San Francisco Loc. Joint Exec. Bd. v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 73-1489, 73-1579 and 73-1605. Argued April 5, 1974. Decided June 21, 1974. David Nevins, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Barry S. Jellison and David J. Salniker were on the brief for petitioners. Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., NLRB, with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, were on the brief, for respondent