Triple A Fire Protection

11 Cited authorities

  1. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 329 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. Intermountain Rural Elec. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    984 F.2d 1562 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding of fait accompli because employer had implemented unilateral change in policy before union received notice of change
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Viola Industries-Elevator Division, Inc.

    979 F.2d 1384 (10th Cir. 1992)   Cited 22 times
    Applying the 10(b) time bar to an employer's affirmative defense that its grant of voluntary recognition was the product of unlawful coercion
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adco Electric Inc.

    6 F.3d 1110 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that employee "recommend[ing] someone for hire and [bringing] problems with apprentice employees to the attention of [his superior] is nothing more than what [the employer] would expect from experienced employees"
  6. Carpenter Sprinkler Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    605 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1979)   Cited 31 times
    Concluding that since "the Board is not required to observe automatically all the rules of evidence governing the trial of cases in court," it was entitled to create a new evidentiary rule
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Tex-Tan, Inc.

    318 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 45 times
    In NLRB v. Tex-tan, Inc., 318 F.2d 472, 478 (5th Cir. 1972), the Fifth Circuit found that the union's demand that records be provided in a "organized fashion" was unreasonable and that the company's "unqualified offer" to "see and copy any of its records" met the union's rights to be provided with information.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Koenig Iron Works, Inc.

    856 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 5 times
    Denying enforcement of bargaining order where twelve years expired between expiration of collective bargaining agreement and order
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Morse Shoe, Inc.

    591 F.2d 542 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times

    No. 77-3313. February 22, 1979. William R. Stewart (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Madeline Balk (argued), Seligman Seligman, New York City, for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr., United States District Judge, Northern District of California, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board ("Board")

  10. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,211 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”