§

Tidelands Marine Service, Inc.

140 N.L.R.B. 288 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Tidelands Marine Service, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  2. Texas N.O.R. Co. v. Ry. Clerks

    281 U.S. 548 (1930)   Cited 381 times
    Finding provision in Railway Labor Act stating that employees' right to designate representatives without interference, influence, or coercion did not violate employer's right to freedom of association

  3. Labor Board v. Cheney Lumber Co.

    327 U.S. 385 (1946)   Cited 137 times
    Noting § 10(e) insures that "all controversies of fact, and the allowable inferences from the facts, be threshed out . . . in the first instance before the Board"

  4. Southern Ry. v. Gray

    241 U.S. 333 (1916)   Cited 119 times
    In Southern Railway Co. v. Gray, 241 U.S. 333, 36 S.Ct. 558, 560, 60 L.Ed. 1030, the Supreme Court, in holding that a motion to dismiss as of non-suit for failure to show negligence of the railroad in an action brought under the Federal Employers' Liability Act should have been granted, said: "In an effort to discredit the passenger engineer, only witness to some circumstances, he was asked on cross-examination concerning prior contradictory statements; but the exclusion of all or any part of his evidence would not change the result.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ferguson

    257 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 38 times

    No. 16973. June 30, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Ralph W. Malone, Malone, Lipscomb Seay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is a Petition by the Board for enforcement of an Order, 118 N.L.R.B. No. 30, finding the Employer, Shovel Supply Company, guilty of 8(a)(1), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), violations and requiring the reinstatement of four

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  8. Cone Brothers Contract. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    235 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 20 times

    No. 15830. June 22, 1956. Rehearing Denied July 20, 1956. Ralph C. Dell, Le Roy Allen, Tampa, Fla., Reeves, Allen Dell, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, CAMERON and JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. In the Employer's petition for review of the findings

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quest-Shon Mark B

    185 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17, Docket 21624. Argued October 4, 1950. Decided November 9, 1950. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Plaut, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Adolph I. King, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard P. Walsh, Washington, D.C., and Angelo A. Tumminelli, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before LEARNED HAND, Chief

  10. E. Anthony Sons v. National Labor Rel. Board

    163 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1947)   Cited 10 times

    No. 9385. Argued March 11, 1947. Decided June 23, 1947. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 89. On Petition for Review and on Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by E. Anthony Sons, Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the Board wherein the Board sought a decree enforcing the Board's order. Petition to set aside order of Board denied and petition of Board granted. Mr. Elisha