§

The Richard W. Kaase Co.

141 N.L.R.B. 245 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
The Richard W. Kaase Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  3. Fusco v. Richard W. Kaase Baking Co.

    205 F. Supp. 465 (N.D. Ohio 1962)   Cited 8 times

    Civ. No. C 62-261. May 23, 1962. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, and James M. Fitzpatrick and James A. Sullivan, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff the United States. Jack G. Day and Bernard A. Berkman, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent Bakery Confectionery Workers International Union of America, Local 19, and for Richard W. Kaase Baking Co., Edward Chitlik, Cleveland, Ohio. GREEN, District Judge. Philip Fusco, Regional Director of the Eighth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, filed a petition

  4. Paul M. O'Neill Inter. Det. Agency v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.2d 936 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    No. 12992. Argued March 7, 1960. Decided June 22, 1960. C.P. Lambos, New York City (Lorenz, Finn Giardino, New York City, Alfred Giardino, Joseph A. Byrne, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and FORMAN, Circuit Judges. FORMAN, Circuit

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Somerville Cream

    199 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 4642. October 22, 1952. James A. Ryan, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. James Charles Roy, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order issued by it on August 17, 1951, directed against respondent

  6. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"