§

The Ready-Mix Concrete Co.

142 N.L.R.B. 502 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
The Ready-Mix Concrete Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.

    371 U.S. 224 (1963)   Cited 133 times
    In Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."

  2. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Consumers Power Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    113 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1940)   Cited 56 times
    In Consumers Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 113 F.2d 38, 41, we considered and rejected the argument that no immediate and direct effect upon interstate commerce follows a labor controversy which curtails the employer's activity when its products are sold to an intervening private agency over whom the employer has no authority or control. It was said in Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 59 S.Ct. 206, 214, 83 L. Ed. 126, "it is the effect upon interstate or foreign commerce, not the source of the injury, which is the criterion."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Townsend

    185 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1950)   Cited 30 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Townsend, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 378, this court found jurisdiction in respect to the activities of a local Hudson automobile dealer where it appeared that while the respondent, operating at Santa Maria, California, purchased all of his new automobiles from the Hudson Sales Corporation at Los Angeles, yet the latter organization shipped all of such automobiles into the State from outside points.

  6. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Bank of Am., Etc

    130 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1942)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 9784, 9785. September 14, 1942. Rehearing Denied December 17, 1942. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petitions for enforcement of order of the National Labor Relations Board against Bank of America National Trust Savings Association based on violations by respondent of the National Labor Relations Act, § 8(1, 3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(1, 3), by the discriminatory discharge of a certain employee and of a group of employees. Orders modified and as modified

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co.

    183 F.2d 451 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 12 times

    No. 12522. July 17, 1950. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Elmer Davis, Chief Law Officer, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner. John M. Scott, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and WALLER, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Since, and pursuant to, the former opinion in this case, the correct answers to the several questions therein propounded have been stipulated, supplemental

  8. J.L. Brandeis Sons v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    142 F.2d 977 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 18 times

    No. 12782. June 7, 1944. On Petition to Review and Set Aside Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by J.L. Brandeis Sons, a Nebraska corporation, to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and a request by the Board for enforcement of this order. Order affirmed and decree enforcing it entered. Ralph E. Svoboda, of Omaha, Neb. (J.A.C. Kennedy, Yale C. Holland, George L. DeLacy, Kennedy, Holland, DeLacy Svoboda, L.J. Tierney, and Harry R. Henatsch, all of

  9. Pueblo Gas Fuel Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    118 F.2d 304 (10th Cir. 1941)   Cited 18 times

    No. 2147. March 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Pueblo Gas Fuel Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Order affirmed. Donald C. McCreery, of Denver, Colo. (Paul W. Lee, George H. Shaw, and Wm. A. Bryans, III, all of Denver, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles A. Graham, of Denver Colo. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Davis Motors

    192 F.2d 782 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 5 times

    No. 4281. November 5, 1951. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Nancy M. Sherman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Emory L. O'Connell, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before, PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S