The Mary Leila Cotton Mills, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 11, 194130 N.L.R.B. 238 (N.L.R.B. 1941) Copy Citation In the Matter of THE MARY LEILA COTTON MILLS, INC., and TEXTILE: WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA Case No. R-2358.-Decided March 11, 1941 Jurisdiction : cotton cloth manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence ofrquestion : parties. stipulated that the Company refused` to accord the Union recognition unless. it was certified by the Board; pay roll agreed to by parties-directed to be used ; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : production and maintenance em- ployees, including watchmen, but excluding clerical and supervisory employ- ees ; stipulation as to. Mr. R. H. Rrazzell, of Atlanta, Ga., for the Union. Weekes di Candler, of Decatur, Ga., by Mr. John Wesley TVeeke& and Mr. Murphey Candler, Jr., for the Company. Mr. Louis S. Penfield, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On February 10, 1941, Textile Workers Union of America, herein called the Union, filed with the Regional Director for -the Tenth Region (Atlanta, Georgia) a petition alleging that a question affect- ing commerce,, had -arisen-concerning the .representation,of^,.employ-ees of The Mary Leila Cotton Mills, Inc.,1 Greensboro, Georgia, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certifica- tion of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On Feb- ruary 19, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regu- lations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and author- ized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On February 20, 1941, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company and 1Incorrectly designated in some of the formal papers as "Mary Leila Cotton Mill." 30 N. L. R. B., No. 32. 238' THE MARY LEILA COTTON MILLS, INC. 239 the Union. Pursuant to notice a hearing was held February 28, 1941, at Greensboro, Georgia, before John C. McBee, the Trial Ex- aminer duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Com- pany and the Union were represented by counsel and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross- examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was affored a'll'parties. During the course^of'the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Mary Leila Cotton Mills, Inc., a Georgia corporation, engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of cotton cloth, operates Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation