§
The Kroger Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,306 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  4. Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 63 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Esquire, Inc.

    222 F.2d 253 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11318. April 29, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Julius Topol, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Herman Smith, Sidney R. Zatz, Walter N. Kaufman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before LINDLEY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SWAIM, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Englander Co.

    237 F.2d 599 (3d Cir. 1956)

    No. 11866. Argued September 28, 1956. Decided October 16, 1956. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack B. Weinstein, New York City (Milton Paulson, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. (Joseph Lew, New York City, on the brief, for intervenor Local 21 Retail Clerks) Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and