§

The J.C. Hamilton Co.

104 N.L.R.B. 737 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
The J.C. Hamilton Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  4. Continental Oil Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Board

    113 F.2d 473 (10th Cir. 1940)   Cited 38 times
    In Continental Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 113 F.2d 473, 477 (10 Cir., 1940) one of the questions was "The identity of the union".

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.

    116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.

  6. Oughton v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    118 F.2d 486 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 32 times
    In Oughton v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 118 F.2d 486, at page 497, in which we applied the ruling in the Machinists case relating to change of status, we said: "* * * The Machinists case points out the immateriality of an asserted loss of a bargaining agent's majority to the issue raised by a complaint based upon the employer's unfair labor practices, except, of course, in so far as the Board in its uncontrolled discretion may deem the agent's status worthy of investigation and consequent action.

  7. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler

    199 F.2d 64 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    No. 10718. Argued June 3, 1952. Decided September 30, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen., Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mary Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Richard C. Bull, Philadelphia, Pa. (White, Williams Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. KALODNER

  8. Great Southern T. Co. v. National L. Rel. Bd.

    139 F.2d 984 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4874. January 10, 1944. Petition for rule to show cause, to adjudge in contempt, and for other relief. Proceedings on petition by National Labor Relations Board for an order adjudging the Great Southern Trucking Company and L.A. Raulerson in contempt of a decree enforcing an order of the Board. Order issued. Winthrop A. Johns and A. Norman Somers, Attys., both of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief)

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swift Co.

    162 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1947)   Cited 12 times

    No. 9228. Argued February 18, 1947. Decided June 11, 1947. On petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Swift Company, respondent. Petition granted, and decree entered directing enforcement of order as modified. Elizabeth Weston, of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris A. Glushien, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  10. Motorola, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    199 F.2d 82 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12996. September 30, 1952. Writ of Certiorari Denied January 5, 1953. See 73 S.Ct. 336. Jennings, Strouss, Salmon Trask, Irving A. Jennings, Richard G. Kleindienst, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Elizabeth Weston, Marshall J. Seidman and Charles Hacker, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge