§

The Hinde & Dauch Paper Co.

104 N.L.R.B. 847 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
The Hinde & Dauch Paper Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Morgan v. United States

    304 U.S. 1 (1938)   Cited 634 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is "not the function of the court to probe the mental processes of the Secretary"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    180 F.2d 840 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co., 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 840, 844, similar contentions were considered and determined.

  3. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler

    199 F.2d 64 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    No. 10718. Argued June 3, 1952. Decided September 30, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen., Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mary Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Richard C. Bull, Philadelphia, Pa. (White, Williams Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. KALODNER

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Red Rock Co.

    187 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13375. February 15, 1951. Rehearing Denied March 9, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. M.E. Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Georgia, for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. In its general aspects this is an ordinary proceeding by the Board for the enforcement of one of its remedial