§

The Crossett Co.

140 N.L.R.B. 667 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
The Crossett Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. National Van Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    273 F.2d 402 (7th Cir. 1960)   Cited 21 times
    In National Van Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the contract-drivers were independent contractors.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wheland Company

    271 F.2d 122 (6th Cir. 1959)   Cited 14 times

    No. 13792. October 29, 1959. Hans J. Lehmann, Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for petitioner N.L.R.B. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., Witt, Gaither, Abernathy, Caldwell Wilson, Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief, for respondent. Hugh Hafer, Milwaukee, Wis., David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel, David Leo Uelmen, Goldberg, Previant Cooper, Milwaukee, Wis., on the

  5. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 15038, 15079. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided May 19, 1960. Mr. Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15038. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  6. Operating Eng. L. Un. No. 3 v. N.L.R.B

    266 F.2d 905 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 5 times
    In Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 v. NLRB, the Court of Appeals approved the Board's conclusion that a contractor did not violate the Act by complying with a subcontracting clause under which it was not permitted to subcontract engineering work to a firm that did not observe the terms of the union's contract.