§
The Cross Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire

    315 U.S. 568 (1942)   Cited 2,010 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the only type of language denied First Amendment protection is fighting words

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Valley Die Cast Corporation

    303 F.2d 64 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Valley Die Cast Corporation, supra, 303 F.2d 4, affirmed findings of 71 discriminatory discharges and refusals to rehire.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  4. Cross Company v. N.L.R.B

    286 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14237. February 2, 1961. Rehearing Denied April 15, 1961. See 288 F.2d 188. Robert C. Winter, Detroit, Mich. (Robert C. Winter, H. William Butler, David P. Wood, Clark, Klein, Brucker Waples, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Pollack, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and Hans J. Lehmann, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Superior Tool Die Company

    309 F.2d 692 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 8 times

    No. 14778. November 16, 1962. Nancy Sherman, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Roy Browne, Akron, Ohio, John E. Kaufman, Akron, Ohio, on brief, for respondent. Before McALLISTER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and DARR, Senior District Judge. O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge. The National

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Fred P. Weissman

    170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) and N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Mfg. Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), the ownership of the successor was substantially the same as that of the predecessor.

  8. Cross Company v. National Labor Relations BD

    288 F.2d 188 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 2 times

    No. 14237. April 15, 1961. Robert C. Winter, H. William Butler, David P. Wood, Clark, Klein, Brucker Waples, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin Pollack and Hans J. Lehmann, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SIMONS, Senior Judge, and MARTIN and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. On February 2, 1961, we decided in the

  9. Cross Company v. Leedom

    271 F.2d 247 (6th Cir. 1959)   Cited 3 times

    No. 13934. October 9, 1959. Clark, Klein, Brucker Waples, Detroit, Mich., argued by Robert C. Winter, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., argued by Duane B. Beeson, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before MARTIN, MILLER and CECIL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In a representative election held under the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq., Local 155, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taylor-Colquitt Co.

    140 F.2d 92 (4th Cir. 1943)   Cited 10 times

    No. 5101. November 8, 1943. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order against the Taylor-Colquitt Company and another. Order enforced. Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, General Counsel; Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel; Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Ida Klaus and Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations